Pelaksanaan Putusan Eksekusi BANI atas Sengketa Kontrak antara Badan Layanan Umum BP3TI dengan PT. Indonesia Comnets Plus dan Konsorsium NIPRESS
(Studi Putusan BANI Nomor: 927/II/ARB-BANI/2017)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v7i2.7787Keywords:
Verdict, Arbitrage, Dispute, ContractAbstract
The Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI) is an option in resolving contract disputes between the government and private parties. When the government is in a losing position in a contract dispute according to the BANI decision, the government must comply with the BANI decision. This study aims to understand the implementation of the execution of BANI decisions that conflict with Law Number 1 of 2004 concerning State Treasury and the authority of the Supreme Court to address the issue of BANI decisions that conflict with Law Number 1 of 2004 concerning State Treasury. The focus of this research includes the execution of BANI decisions that are contrary to Law Number 1 of 2004 concerning State Treasury and the Authority of the Supreme Court to the Court that confiscates state assets. The research method used in this research is normative juridical through statutory and conceptual approaches using secondary legal data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The data obtained from library research is then analyzed using descriptive qualitative. Based on the research, it is found that the execution of the BANI decision carried out by the court through the confiscation of a sum of money in an account belonging to the BP3TI Public Service Agency should not be carried out because this has contradicted Article 50 of Law Number 1 of 2004 concerning State Treasury. Therefore, the Supreme Court is expected to play a role in providing solutions by providing guidance to the lower courts including the district courts by issuing a Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA).
Downloads
References
Buku
Hartiwiningsih et.al, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, (Tanggerang Selatan: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2020)
Harahap M. Yahya, Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005)
Hasan IqbaI, Analisis Data Penelitian Dengan Statistik, (Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2008)
Hadjon Philipus M, et.al, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, (Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2002)
Kolopaking Anita D.A, Asas Iktikad Baik Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kontrak Melalui Arbitrase, (Bandung: P.T. Alumni, 2013)
Rijanto R. Benny, Hukum Acara Perdata, (Tanggerang Selatan: Universitas Terbuka, 2019)
HR Ridwan, Hukum Administrasi Negara, (Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2003)
Jurnal
Aritonang Agnes Grace, “Peran Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan Dalam Perlindungan Dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup,†Crepido, 3.1 (2021).
Emirzon Joni, “Penyelesaian sengketa bisnis melalui badan arbitrase dan implementasi putusan arbitrase di indonesia,†September, 2017.
Hasibuan Rinsofat Naibaho dan Indra Jaya M, “Peranan Mahkamah Agung Dalam Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan Melalui Kekuasaan Kehakiman,†Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion, 2.02 (2021).
Kuahaty Sarah S, “Pemerintah Sebagai Subjek Hukum Perdata Dalam Kontrak Pengadaan Barang Atau Jasa,†Jurnal Sasi, 17.3 (2011).
Priangga Rizal Widiya Priangga et.al , “Analisis Yuridis Sita Umum Aset Badan Usaha Milik Negara Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2004 Tentang Perbendaharaan Negara,†Jurnal Privat Law, 5.1 (2017).
Santoso A.A. Gede D. H, “The Waterboards,†Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 5.2 (2019).
Santoso Raihan Andhika, “Kedudukan dan Kekuatan Hukum Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung ( Sema ) Dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia,†Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum, 1.4 (2023).
Situmorang, “Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Nasional Di Indonesia (Enforcement Of National Arbitration Award In Indonesia),†Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 17.4 (2017).
Tampongangoy Grace Henni, “Arbitrase Merupakan Upaya Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Dagang Internasionalâ€, Lex et Societatis, III. 1 (2015).
Walukow Julita Melissa, “Perwujudan Prinsip Equality Before The Law Bagi Narapidana Di Dalam Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Di Indonesiaâ€, Lex et Societatis, 1.1 (2013).
Widowati et.al, “Kepastian Hukum Putusan Yang Melanggar Special Straf Maxima,†Jurnal Yudisial, 14.1 (2021).
Zulfikar Ahmad Arif, “Kajian Yuridis Tentang Penyelesaian Sengketa Perjanjian Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Pemerintah Perspektif Hukum Ekonomi Syariah,†Widya Pranata Hukum : Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum, 3.1 (2020).
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2004 Tentang Perbendaharaan Negara
Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2009.Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1985 Tentang Mahkamah Agung
Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang atau Jasa Pemerintah
Putusan BANI Nomor: 927/II/ARB-BANI/2017.
Website
Unhas Press, “Kontrak Publikâ€, 2021, https://unhaspress.unhas.ac.id/terbitan/kontrak-publik/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles in Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum can be disseminated provided they include the identity of the article and the source of the article (Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum). The publisher is not responsible for the contents of the article. The content of the article is the sole responsibility of the author
Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is lincensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
