Legal Analysis Of The Resolution of The Trademark Plagiarisme Dispute Between MS Glow And PS Glow

Authors

  • Sulasno Law Study Program, Serang Raya University
  • Cindi Nur Febriani Law Study Program, Serang Raya University
  • Nada Salsabila Kusuma Law Study Program , Serang Raya University
  • Hasuri Law Study Program, Serang Raya University
  • Rethorika Berthanila Public Administration Study Program, Serang Raya University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v9i2.gqwqdv20

Keywords:

Trademark, Dispute, Ms Glow and Ps glow

Abstract

A brand is an identification mark that is used to specifically differentiate between one product and another product. Trademarks are in the form of images, logos, names, words, letters, numbers, color schemes, two and/or three dimensions, sounds, holograms, or a combination of both. The factors above are to differentiate goods and/or services produced by individuals or legal entities in the context of trading goods and/or services. As technology and information develop, there are many disputes regarding brands. Like the MS Glow and PS Glow brand trophies which are widely discussed due to brand plagiarism trophies. The aim of this research is to find out how the Ms Glow and Ps Glow Trademark Dispute is resolved and legal protection efforts for the MS Glow and PS Glow trademarks. This research uses qualitative research methods and a normative type of research with a literature approach. Data search was carried out by reviewing and tracing related laws and regulations, books, literature, articles and documents regarding the study of trade secret issues. The results of this research were that settlements were carried out in two Commercial Courts. The lawsuit at the Medan Niaga District Court was won by Ms Glow, while the lawsuit at the Surabaya Niaga District Court was won by Ms Glow. The decision at the Surabaya Niaga District Court found that the Ms Glow brand used did not comply with the registered brand class

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Betlehn, A, Samosir, P. O. (2018). Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Industri UMKM Di Indonesia, Law and Justice.

Denny, Yenny, Novika, A. (2022). PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MEREK DI

INDONESIA: STUDI PUTUSAN. Jurnal Sapientia et Virtus.

Fakhriah, E. L. (2022). Kapita Selekta Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. CV Mandar Maju.

Ii, B. A. B. (2019). Shyntia Auliya Pasaribu. Perlindungan Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Pembelian Properti di PT. Cipta Graha Sejahtera Selaku Developer dalam Pembangunan Ruko di Kota Batam, 2019. UIB Repository©2019. 8(8), 8–39.

Jened, Rahmi. (2017). Hukum Merek (Trademark Law) Dalam Era Global dan Integrasi Ekonomi. Jakarta: Kencana.

Muhammad Iqbal Nugroho, D. S. H. M. (2022). PLAGIARISME DALAM MEREK DAGANG DAN MEKANISME PENYELESAIANNYA MELALUI ALTERNATIF

PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora.

Buku:

Marzuki, P.M. 2007. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group. Hlm 35

Purwaka, T. H. (2017). Perlindungan Merek. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia. Soekanto, Soerjono dan Mamuji, S. 2014. Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: PT Raja

Grafindo Persada.Hlm. 13

Sutjipto, H. M. N. P. (1984). Pengertian Pokok Pokok Hukum Dagang Indonesia. Jakarta: Djambatan.

Tim Lindsey, dkk, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Suatu Pengantar, PT. Alumni, Bandung, 2019.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan:

Putusan Nomor 2/Pdt.Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/PN Niaga.Mdn Putusan nomor 2/Pdt.Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/PN.Niaga Sby Undang - Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2001 tentang Merek

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.

Sumber lain:

Nuzulul Karamah, “Upaya Mediasi, Septia Siregar Sebut Pihak MS Glow Minta Rp60 Miliar Untuk Damai”. Diakses melalui https://akurat.co/upaya mediasi-septia-siregar-sebut- pihak-ms-glow-minta-rp60-miliar-untuk damai, pada Sabtu 18 Mei 2024, pukul 16.30 WIB.

Wahid, “Karakteristik Merek (Brand Characteristics)”. Diakses melalui https://www.marketing.co.id/karakteristik-merek-brand-characteristics/, pada Sabtu 18 Mei 2024, pukul 09.59 WIB.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-26

How to Cite

Legal Analysis Of The Resolution of The Trademark Plagiarisme Dispute Between MS Glow And PS Glow. (2025). Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(2), 183-192. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v9i2.gqwqdv20

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)