Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The aim of this journal publication is to disseminate the conceptual thoughts or ideas and research results that have been achieved in the area of Legal Studies. Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, particularly focuses on the main problems in the development of the sciences of Law Issues areas as follows Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, International Law, Criminal Law, Bussines Law, Labour Law and Industrial Relations Disputes, Cyber Law, Intellectual Property Right and other scientific studies in accordance with scope field of law research.



Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Every article that goes to the editorial staff will be selected through Initial Review processes by Editorial Board. Then, the articles will be sent to the Mitra Bestari/peer reviewer and will go to the next selection by Double Blind Preview Process. After that, the articles will be returned to the authors to revise. These processes take a three month for a maximum time. In the each manuscript, Mitra Bestari/peer reviewer will be rated from the substantial and technical aspects.


The manuscript processing time :

a). Since author has submission the manuscript, its take a few days for editorial team to works. Its should be waiting section process between 7 - 15 days since article submission, the editor in chief will decide whether the article needs to sending by section editors.

b). Section editors need a time between 7 - 30 days to examine articles based on Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum author guidelines (templates, focus, and scope as well as article content) and will make a decision whether the paper is worthy of being sent to the reviewer, revision first or decline.

c). If the section editor's decision is revision, author has 1-15 days to revise the article in accordance with the recommendations of the section editor.

d). In the revised article given to the section editor to be reviewed, the reviewer needs until 30 days to finish the review. Finally, the reviewer should be to give the recommendations about the article or manuscript among to Accepted, Accepted with revision (minor or major revisions), and Decline or Reject the article.

e). The author has a maximum of 1 month to correct the article and send the revised paper file by marking the revised part in blue or yellow highlight and the file "Response to Reviewer" which records each question per reviewer and answers for each question.

f). The results of the improvement will be sent back to the review and process review maximal until round 3 to gives a decision, Accepted or Declined.

g). The editorial team discusses the final decision in an editorial team meeting whether the articles recommended by the reviewers proceed to be Published or Declined. The editorial team has 30 days to make the final decision.

h). As soon-to-be-published articles, lay-outed and proofreading by the proofreader for 15 days. And the authors have 3 days to confirm the layout result and proofreader should be send the layout result to section editor.

i). Section editor publishes the accepted articles.


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. Archives all of them are digitally submitted to Indonesian National Library's Indonesia OneSearch and periodically harvested by OCLC WorldCat. More...


Publication Ethics

Duties of Authors

  1. Reporting Standards: 

    Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

  2. Data Access and Retention: 

    Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

  3. Originality and Plagiarism: 

    The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

  4. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication: 

    An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

  5. Acknowledgement of Sources: 

    Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

  6. Authorship of the Paper: 

    Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

  7. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: 

    All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

  8. Fundamental errors in published works: 

    When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

  9. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects: 

    If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Duties of Editors

  1. Fair Play: 

    An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

  2. Confidentiality: 

    The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

  3. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: 

    Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

  4. Publication Decisions: 

    The editor board journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

  5. Review of Manuscripts: 

    The editor must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. The editor should organise and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer reviewed. The editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that are considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.

Duties of Reviewers

  1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions:

    Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

  2. Promptness: 

    Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process

  3. Standards of Objectivity: 

    Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

  4. Confidentiality: 

    Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorised by the editor.

  5. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: 

    Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

  6. Acknowledgement of Sources: 

    Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.



Publication Frequency

Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, published biannually on June and December. Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum published by Faculty of Social, Politic and Law, Universitas Serang Raya. E-ISSN 2614-0179 & P-ISSN 2613-9995.


Publication Fee

For publication in Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum allowed for new policy :

If the paper is accepted for publication, you would to pay an Article Publication is Rp.750.000,00 (IDR).

 For payment, you should pay to:

  • Bank Account  :  720 324 7375
  • Name                :  Hasuri
  • Bank (Code)     :  BSI - Bank Syariah Indonesia (451)

As soon as the payment is made, author should be confirmation with sent the transfer payment by email to (jurnal.ajudikasi@unsera.ac.id). For more information, you could be an text by email.


Screening for Plagiarism

Manuscripts submitted to this journal will be filtered for plagiarism using itthenticate applications with a similar level of maximum 20% when published


Copyright Notice

Copyright Notice of Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.