Analisis Perubahan Ketiga Undang-Undang Mahkamah Konstitusi Ditinjau dari Perspektif Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia

  • Ahmad Yusup Universitas Gadjah Mada
Abstract views: 483 , PDF downloads: 866
Keywords: Analysis, Amendment, Regulatory, Constitutional Court

Abstract

The third amendment to the Constitutional Court Act drew a lot of criticism, especially regarding the urgency of the change, considering that the Constitutional Court Law is not included in the priority prolegnas in 2020. There are two issues of the third amendment to the Constitutional Court Law that are highlighted in this article, namely, The Material Analysis of the Third Amendment to the Constitutional Court Law is based on the Regulation on the Formation of Laws and Regulations and the Formal Analysis of the Third Amendment to the Constitutional Court Law In terms of the Law on the Formation of Laws and Regulations. The research method used is a type of normative research. The approaches used in this study are the statute approach, case approach and concept approach using prescriptive analysis. The results of the analysis show that (1) Materially, the Third Amendment to the Constitutional Court Law is based on the Regulation on the Establishment of Laws and Regulations, it is noted that the Third Amendment to the Constitutional Court Law has defects in its amendments, namely regarding the minimum limit of age to be able to become a constitutional judge and regarding the abolition of the period of periodization of constitutional judges which is considered contrary to the constitution or unconstitutional. and (2) Formally, the Third Amendment to the Constitutional Court Law In view of the Law on the Establishment of Laws and Regulations of the Constitutional Court Law, the third amendment has been formally flawed in its amendments, where there are several provisions that are not in accordance with the format of preparation as intended in Law Number 12 of 2011 jo Law Number 15 of 2019 concerning the Establishment of Laws and Regulations (P3 Law).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buku :

Butarbutar, Elisabeth Nurhaini, 2018, Metode Penelitian Hukum, PT Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Eddyono, Sri Wiyanti (edit), 2020, Kertas Kebijakan Catatan Kritis Terhadap UU No 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja, UGM, Yogyakarta.

Efendi, Jonaedi dan Johnny Ibrahim, 2018, Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Pranadamedia Group, Depok.

MD, Moh. Mahfud, 2018, Politik Hukum di Indonesia, PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Depok.

S., Maria Farida Indrati, 2017, Ilmu Perundang-Undangan 2: Proses dan Teknik Pembentukannya, Kanisius, Yogyakarta.

Soejono dan H. Abdurrahman, 2003, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Artikel/Jurnal :

Bisariyadi, “Yudisialisasi Politik dan Sikap Menahan Diri: Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menguji Undang-Undang (Judicialization of Politics and Judicial Restraint: The Role of the Constitutional Court on the Review of Laws), Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 12, Nomor 3, September 2015.

Doly, Denico dan Noverdi Puja Saputra, “Politik Hukum Undang-Undang Tentang Perubahan Ketiga Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Jurnal Kajian Singkat Terhadap Isu Aktual Dan Strategis, Volume XII, Nomor 17/I/Puslit/September/2020.

Omara, Andy, “Interpreting The Indonesian Constitutional Court’s Approach In Conducting Judicial Review In Cases Related To Economic And Social Rights”, Indonesia Law Review, Volume 7, Number 2, May - August 2017.

Rishan, Idul, “Konsep Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi (The Concept of Judicial Review of the Legislative Process in the Constitutional Court)”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 18, Nomor 1, Maret 2021.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan :

Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2003 Nomor 98, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4316).

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2011 Nomor 70, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5226).

Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2011 Nomor 82, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5234).

Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2019 Nomor 183, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6398).

Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan Ketiga Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2020 Nomor 216, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6554).

Sumber Lainnya :

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 7/PUU-XI/2013.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 Perihal Perkara Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Ringkasan Permohonan Perkara Nomor 90/PUU-XVIII/2020 tentang “Pengaturan Syarat Usia Minimal Pengangkatan Hakim Konstitusi dan Penghapusan Periodisasi Masa Jabatan Hakim Konstitusi”.

Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia, https://www.dpr.go.id/uu/prolegnas-long-list, diakses pada 21 November 2021.

PlumX Metrics

Published
2022-12-26
How to Cite
Yusup, A. (2022). Analisis Perubahan Ketiga Undang-Undang Mahkamah Konstitusi Ditinjau dari Perspektif Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia. Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(2), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v6i2.4464