Politik Hukum Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Pasca Perubahan Kedua Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011

  • Nadia Ayu Febriani Universitas Indonesia
  • Ryan Muthiara Wasti Universitas Indonesia
Abstract views: 568 , PDF downloads: 563
Keywords: Legislation, Law-Making Process, Participation, Omnibus

Abstract

Article 22A of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia mandates the establishment of a rule regarding the law-making process, which serves as a guideline for the law-making process from its inception until the regulation is enacted to the public. However, in its implementation, problems are still related to the law-making process in Indonesia. This normative research uses a statutory and conceptual approach that specifically looks at "over regulated" or "legal obesity” to analyze the legal politics of the formation of laws and regulations after the second amendment of Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Establishment of Laws and Regulations. In this context, there is an overlap between one law and another, which creates sectoral egos and results in legal uncertainty in its application. One of the causes of this legal obesity is the lack of regularity in the law-making process. In this case, legislators do not always refer to the guidelines for the law-making process and the principles for forming statutory regulations as stipulated in the law-making process regulation. In addition, the law still needs to be optimal in fulfilling meaningful participation. Therefore, the author will analyze the politics of law of the amendments of law-making process regulation after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, which includes accommodating the omnibus method and the concept of meaningful community participation as a solution for overlapping legislation in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arinanto, Satya. Politik Hukum 2. Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2018.

Audrey O’Brien & Marc Bosc, eds. House of Commons Procedure and Practice, 2nd Ed. Cowansville, QC: House of Commons & Éditions Yvon Blais, 2009.

Bappenas. Pedoman Penerapan Reformasi Regulasi. Jakarta: Bappenas, 2011.

Black. H.C., Black’s Law Dictionary: Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern, (6th ed.), St. Paul, Minn: West Publishing, 1990.

BPHN, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. 2019. “Pedoman Evaluasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Kemenkumham. Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia.

Ferry Irawan Febriansyah, “Konsep Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia”, Jurnal Perspektif Vol. XXI No, 3 (September 2016).

Habibi dan Muchtar Sani, “Jalan Panjang Mengobati Obesitas Regulasi”, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol. 19 No.2 (2022).

Husnayati Erni, Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Proses Pembentukan Undang-Undang No 17 Tahun 2013 tentang Organisasi Kemasyarakatan, Thesis, Fak. Hukum,Universitas Indonesia, 2004.

Ibnu Sina Chandranegara. “Bentuk-Bentuk Perampingan dan Harmonisasi Regulasi, Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM No. 3 Vol. 26 (September 2019).

Indonesia, Undang-Undang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, UU No. 12 Tahun 2011, LN No. 82 Tahun 2011, TLN No. 5234, Penjelasan.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Putusan MK No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020.

Manan, Bagir. Dasar-Dasar Konstitusional Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Nasional. Padang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas, 1994.

Mattalatta, Andi. “Politik Hukum Perundang-Undangan.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 6 (2009): 572.

Michel Bédard, “Omnibus Bills: Frequently Asked Questions”, Publication Paper No. 2012-79-E, 1 Oktober 2012, online: <https://lop.parl.ca/sites/PublicWebsite/default/en_CA/ResearchPublications/201279E#txt5>

Moh. Mahfud, MD. Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakkan Konstitusi. Jakarta: Pustaka

Na’a, I Gde Pantja Astawa dan Suprin. Dinamika Hukum dan Ilmu Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia. Bandung: PT. ALUMNI, 2012.

Nur Aji Pratama, “Meaningful Participation Sebagai Upaya Kompromi Idee Des Recht Pasca Putusan MK No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, Jurnal Crepido Vol. 4 No. 2 (November 2022).

Omnibus bills in theory and practice,” online: < https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Omnibus+bills+in+theory+and+practice.-a0328162667 >

Omnibus regulation: Council adopts new, simplified, agricultural rules”, online: < https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2017/12/12/omnibus-regulation-council-adopts-new-simplified-agricultural-rules/ >

Omnibus regulation: simpler rules for use of EU funds adopted”, online: < https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2018/07/16/omnibus-regulation-simpler-rules-for-use-of-eu-funds-adopted/ >

PE-CONS 56/17, online: < https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/32072/pe00056en17.pdf >

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1991.

Rizaty, Monavia Ayu. Hari Konstitusi, Berapa Jumlah Peraturan di Indonesia?, n.d. dataindonesia.id.

Saragih, Bintan R. Politik Hukum. Bandung: Utomo, 2006.

Supriyadi, “Gagasan Penggunaan Metode Omnibus Law dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah”, Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol. 15 No. 2 (2021).

Susi Dwi Harijanti, Lailani Sungkar, Wicaksana Dramanda. “Laporan Hasil Penelitian Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Urgensi dan Batu Uji.” Bandung: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran, 2020.

Toruan, H.D.L., “Pembentukan Regulasi Badan Usaha dengan Model Omnibus Law”, Jurnal Hukum to-ra Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017).

Turkey: Omnibus Bill Dated 11.09.2014”, online: < https://www.mondaq.com/turkey/CorporateCommercial-Law/348688/Omnibus-Bill-Dated-11092014 >

Wicipto Setiadi, “Simplifikasi Regulasi Dengan Menggunakan Metode Pendekatan Omnibus Law”, Jurnal Rechtsvinding Vol. 9 No. 1 (April 2020).

PlumX Metrics

Published
2023-06-10
How to Cite
Febriani, N. A., & Wasti, R. M. (2023). Politik Hukum Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Pasca Perubahan Kedua Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 . Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(1), 35-58. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v7i1.6483