Penerapan Asas Nebis in Idem yang Diajukan di Peradilan Berbeda Berdasarkan Asas Contante Justitie: (Studi Putusan Nomor 287/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Skh)

Andi Setiawan; Amir Junaidi; Ariy Khaerudin; Dika Yudanto

doi:10.30656/ajudikasi.v7i2.7636

Authors

Andi Setiawan Universitas Islam Batik
Amir Junaidi Universitas Islam Batik
Ariy Khaerudin Universitas Islam Batik
Dika Yudanto Universitas Islam Batik

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v7i2.7636

Keywords:

Nebis in Idem Principle, Contante Justitie Principle, Civil Case Handling

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the application of the principle of nebis in idem in the handling of civil case Number 287/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Skh. which corresponds to the principle of contante Justitie and to know and analyze the handling of cases carried out by judges who examine, hear, and decide cases handled by the Sukoharjo Religious Court, by looking at the considerations of judges in applying the principle of nebis in idem. This research is normative legal research, using secondary data which is processed using qualitative techniques. The results of this study indicate that: (1) the handling of civil case Number 287/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Skh. in its decision is appropriate and has applied the principle of nebis in idem properly, because the elements of nebis in idem as required in the Civil Code have cumulatively been fulfilled; (2) the considerations given by the panel of judges in giving the decision are appropriate and correct based on applicable legal principles. (3) cases containing elements of nebis in idem must be filed an exception and an exception can only be filed in the first answer along with a rebuttal to the subject matter. It is recommended that in the future a dismissal process can be carried out before cases related to nebis in idem are examined and tried like the mechanism in the state administrative court, in order to provide legal certainty for justice seekers as well as implement the principles of fast, simple, and light costs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asnawi, M. Natsir. Hukum Acara Perdata: Teori, Praktek dan Permasalahannya di Peradilan Umum dan Peradilan Agama. 1st ed. Yogyakarta : UII Press, 2016.

Butarbutar, E. N. â€œAsas Nebis In Idem dalam Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum.â€ Jurnal Yudisial 11, No. 1 (2018).

Cleynenbreugel, Pieter. Van. â€œBPost and Nordzucker: Searching for the Essence of Ne Bis in Idem in European Union Law.â€ European Constitutional Law Review 18, No. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1574019622000190.

Dyah, O, S., & Aâ€™an, E. Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research): Upaya Mewujudkan Hukum Yang Pasti dan Berkeadilan. Sinar Grafika, 2015.

Hasyim, Fuadz. â€œImplementasi Asas Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat dan Biaya Murah Melalui E-Court.â€ Syariati: Jurnal Studi Al-Qurâ€™an Dan Hukum 8, No. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.32699/syariati.v8i2.4069.

Iftitah, Anik, ed. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mei 2023. Sada Kurnia Pustaka, 2023.

â€”â€”â€”, ed. Perkembangan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Sada Kurnia Pustaka, 2023. https://sadapenerbit.com/2023/10/23/perkembangan-hukum-pidana-di-indonesia/.

KUHPer. â€œKitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata,â€ n.d.

Sarwono. Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.

â€”â€”â€”. Hukum Acara Perdata (Teori Dan Praktik). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.

SEMA3. Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2002 tentang Penanganan Perkara yang Berkaitan dengan Asas Nebis In Idem (2002).

Syahrani, Riduan. Buku Materi Dasar Hukum Acara Perdata. Bandung: Citra Aditya, 2009.

Tartusi, A., Setyowati, R. K., & Kusumadewi, Y. â€œAnalisis Yuridis Penerapan Asas Nebis In Idem dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata.â€ Krisna Law 2, no. 1 (2020).

UUKK. Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (2009).

Zainuddin, A. Rahman. â€œPenanganan Perkara yang Berkaitan dengan Azas Ne Bis In Idem.â€ Jurnal Al-Mizan 10, No. 1 (2014). https://www.neliti.com/id/publications/289967/penanganan-perkara-yang-berkaitan-dengan-azas-ne-bis-in-idem.