Evaluasi Satu Dekade Pembangunan Zona Integritas di Instansi Pemerintah Pusat Indonesia
Abstract views: 306
,
Pdf (Bahasa Indonesia) downloads: 366
Abstract
Integrity in public institutions is an important thing that needs attention in achieving bureaucratic reform. Indonesia has established a policy of developing integrity zones (ZI) in government agencies to improve the implementation of excellent public services, free of corruption, collusion, and nepotism. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of ZI development in Indonesian Central Government Agencies. The evaluation is carried out to see changes and the impact of policy implementation comprehensively. This study used qualitative methods through in-dept interviews and study documents. The study results concluded that the implementation of ZI Development policies in Indonesian Central Government Agencies had been quite good to regard ZI development as a series of implementations of Indonesian bureaucratic reform. New values have been formed in work units with ZI predicate WBK/WBBM. The Public Service Index for Central Government Agencies increases yearly, above the national index value. However, several obstacles are encountered, including awareness and understanding of the meaning/essence still needs to be optimized, and the number of PANRB Ministry human resources as supervisors and evaluators considering a large number of work units of the Indonesian government agencies.
Downloads
References
Abidin, S. Z. (2019). Kebijakan Publik (Edisi 4). Salemba Humanika.
Abidin, Z., Didi, L., & Yuharsi. (2021). Implementasi Kebijakan E-Procurement di Kabupaten Buton Selatan. Sawala : Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 9(2), 155–167.
Agustina, I. S. (2019). Implementasi Kebijakan Zona Integritas dalam Mewujudkan Pelayanan Publik di Kantor Pertanahan Kota Bandung. http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id /penelitian/detail/182206
Alam, M. M., Johari, R. J., & Said, J. (2018). An empirical assessment of employee integrity in the public sector of Malaysia. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 34(4), 458–471. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-01-2018-0006
Anggayudha, Z. H., & Rafsanjani, J. I. (2022). Information and Technology-Based Policy Strategy for Monitoring and Evaluation of Government Agencies with Corruption-Free Zone/ Serving and Clean Bureaucracy Zone Status. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 16(1), 175–194.
Anggraini, W. (2020). Good Governance, International Organizations and Policy Transfer : Case of Indonesian Bureaucratic Reform Policy. Jurnal Administrasi dan Kebijakan Publik, 26(May), 33–46. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jkap/article/view/68703/ 33863
Aulich, C. (2011). Integrity agencies as one pillar of integrity and good governance. Public Policy and Administration, 10(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.10.1.227
Baker, J., & Milne, S. (2015). Dirty Money States: Illicit Economies and the State in Southeast Asia. Critical Asian Studies, 47(2), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14672715.2015.1041273
Brown, A. J., & Heinrich, F. (2017). National Integrity Systems – An evolving approach to anti-corruption policy evaluation. Crime, Law and Social Change, 68(3), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9707-1
Cahyono, Dodik Ari; Suardana, I. R. (2021). Strategi Pembangunan Zona Integritas. 10(7), 574–589. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/EEB/
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design (Fourth Edi). Sage Publications.
Deviyanti, D., & Bintoro, K. (2021). Analisis Penerapan Good Corporate Governance (GCG) Melalui Reformasi Birokrasi Menuju Wilayah Bebas Korupsi dan Wilayah Birokrasi Bersih dan Melayani (WBK/WBBM). Syntax Literate ; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 6(6), 2679. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v6i6.3104
Dye, T. R. (2017). Understanding Public Policy. In Understanding Public Policy.
Egbeyong, B. E. (2018). Corruption in Cameroon: Public Perception on the Role and Effectiveness of the Different Anti-Corruption Agencies. Review of Public Administration and Management, 06(01), 1–6.
Hamzah, A. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Rekrontruksi Pemikiran Dasar serta Contoh Penerapan pada Ilmu Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora. Literasi Nusantara.
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2020). Studying public policy : principles and processes (Fourth Edi). Oxford Univercity Press.
Jazuli, A., Penelitian, B., Hukum, K., & Indonesia, R. (2021). Komitmen Agen Perubahan Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Pembangunan Zona Integritas Berkelanjutan (Commitment Agent of Change Ministry of Law and Human Rights in Development of Sustainable Integrity Zone). Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 15(3), 415–430.
Julia, H., Purnaweni, H., & Priyadi, B. P. (2019). Implementasi Pembangunan Zona Integritas Menuju Wilayah Bebas Dari Korupsi Dan Wilayah Birokrasi Bersih Dan Melayani Di BBWS Pemali Juana Semarang. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 1, 25–42. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/dialogue/article/download/5222/2846
Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. (2012). Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 60 Tahun 2012 tentang Pedoman Pembangunan Zona Integritas Menuju Wilayah Bebas Dari Korupsi dan Wilayah Birokrasi Bersih dan Melayani di Lingkungan Kementerian/Lembaga dan Pemerintahan
Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. (2017). Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2017 tentang Pedoman Penilaian Kinerja Unit Penyelenggara Pelayanan Publik. Kemenpan RB, 61. https://jdih.menpan.go.id/ data_puu/final 17.pdf
Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. (2021a). [LIVE] Penyampaian Hasil Evaluasi dan Penghargaan Pelayanan Publik di Lingkup K/L/D Tahun 2021. In Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. menpan.go.id. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0fv3So5Rkc
Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. (2021b). Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 90 Tahun 2021 tentang Pembangunan dan Evaluasi Zona Integritas Menuju Wilayah Bebas dari Korupsi dan Wilayah Birokrasi Bersih dan Melayani di Instansi Pemerintah.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2022a). Statistik TPK Berdasarkan Jenis Perkara. kpk.go.id. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/penindakan/tpk-berdasarkan-jenis-perkara
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2022b). Statistik TPK Berdasarkan Wilayah. kpk.go.id. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/penindakan/tpk-berdasarkan-wilayah
Nur Asriansyah, M., Sampurna, R. H., & Meigawati, D. (2022). Implementasi Rehabilitasi Sosial Dasar Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Di Dinas Sosial Kota Sukabumi. Sawala : Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 10(1), 98–111.
Pramusinto, A. (2009). Mencari Alternatif Strategi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jurnal Administrasi dan Kebijakan Publik, 13(1), 1–17.
Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2010). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 81 Tahun 2010 tentang Grand Design Reformasi Birokrasi 2010-2025. In Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia (No. 81).
Purwanto, Erwan Agus & Sulistyastuti, D. R. (2015). Implementasi Kebijakan Publik: Konsep dan Aplikasinya di Indonesia. Gava Media.
Putera, C. P. (2019). Optimalisasi Manajemen Perubahan Kasus Pembangunan Zona Integritas Menuju Wilayah Bebas Korupsi dan Wilayah Bersih Bebas Melayani di PPPPTK Seni dan Budaya Yogyakarta. http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/178589
Said, J., Alam, M. M., & Khalid, M. A. (2016). Relationship between good governance and integrity system: Empirical study on the public sector of Malaysia. Humanomics, 32(2), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/H-02-2016-0008
Santoso, A. (2007). Faktor-Faktor Politik, Administrasi dan Budaya dalam Permasalahan Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Administrasi dan Kebijakan Publik, 11(1), 87–98. https:// jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jkap/article/view/8555/6589
Sekretariat Kabinet RI. (2020). Pencanangan. setkab.go.id. https://setkab.go.id/zona-integritas/pencanangan-wbbm/
Smith, Kevin B.; Larimer, C. W. (2009). The Public Policy Theory Primer. Westview Press.
Ssenyonga, M., & Sulistyo, S. (2009). An Assesment of Various Approaches for Countering Corruption in Poor Economies. Jurnal Administrasi dan Kebijakan Publik, 9(2), 135–160. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jkap/article/view/8323/6432
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. CV Alfabeta.
Suraji, S. (2008). Sejarah Panjang Korupsi Di Indonesia & Upaya Pemberantasannya. Jurnal Administrasi dan Kebijakan Publik, 6(2), 135–148. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/ jkap/article/view/8404/6495
Susanto, E. (2009). Memahami Korupsi Dari Perspektif Perilaku Organisasi: Mengapa Seseorang Terjebak dalam Perilaku Korup? Jurnal Administrasi dan Kebijakan Publik, 13(1), 18–30. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jkap/article/view/8178/6350
Taylor, I. W., Ullah, M. A., Koul, S., & Ulloa, M. S. (2022). Evaluating the Impact of Institutional Improvement on Control of Corruption—A System Dynamics Approach. Systems, 10(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10030064
Transparency International. (2022). Corruption Perceptions Index. https://www. transparency.org/en/cpi/2022/index/idn
Wholey, J. S. . (2010). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (K. E. Wholey, Joseph S.; Hatry, Harry P.; Newcomer (ed.); Third Edit).
Wilujeng, D. S., & Pramudyastuti, O. L. (2020). Evaluasi Penerapan Zona Integritas Menuju Wilayah Bebas Dari Korupsi dan Wilayah Birokrasi Bersih Melayani (Studi Pembangunan Zona Integritas Rumah Sakit Jiwa Prof. Dr. Soerojo Magelang). Journal of Economic, Management, Accounting and Technology, 3(2), 127–135. https:// doi.org/10.32500/jematech.v3i2.1286
Copyright (c) 2023 Zahra Wanisa, Roy Valiant Salomo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
