Transformasi Kelembagaan Birokrasi Provinsi Banten: Scenario dan Roadmap Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Banten (Tinjauan Teoritis dan Normatif)

Ahmad Sururi; Rahmi Winangsih; Rahmi Mulyasih

doi:10.30656/btsrad39

Authors

Ahmad Sururi Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Rahmi Winangsih Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Rahmi Mulyasih Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30656/btsrad39

Keywords:

transformasi kelembagaan, pemerintahan daerah, roadmap kelembagaan, skenario kelembagaan, administrasi publik

Abstract

Transformasi kelembagaan menjadi prasyarat penting dalam menjawab tantangan kompleks pemerintahan daerah di era digital dan tata kelola kolaboratif. Artikel ini bertujuan mengkaji secara konseptual skenario dan roadmap transformasi kelembagaan pemerintahan daerah berbasis analisis multidimensi—struktural, kultural, teknologi, dan kapabilitas jaringan. Dengan pendekatan kualitatif dan studi literatur dari sumber-sumber ilmiah nasional dan internasional, artikel ini menawarkan kerangka kerja strategis serta kontribusi terhadap penguatan kapasitas kelembagaan sektor publik. Temuan utama menunjukkan bahwa keberhasilan transformasi membutuhkan pendekatan adaptif, partisipatif, dan integratif, serta sinergi antara reformasi digital dan desain ulang kelembagaan. Artikel ini memberikan kontribusi terhadap ilmu administrasi publik dengan memperkaya teori transformasi kelembagaan serta praktik desain kebijakan kelembagaan yang berkelanjutan.

References

Alok, V. N. (2013). Strengthening of Panchayats in India: Comparing Devolution Across States—Empirical Assessment 2012-13. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 59(1), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019556120130115

Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Røvik, K. A. (2007). Organization Theory and the Public Sector Instrument, culture and myth. In Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035317189.ch393

Du Preez, P., Simmonds, S., & Verhoef, A. H. (2016). Rethinking and researching transformation in higher education: A meta-study of South African trends. Transformation in Higher Education, 1(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.4102/the.v1i1.2

Dwiyanto, A. (2005). Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Pusat Studi Kependudukan dan Kebijakan (PSKK) UGM.

Gegenhuber, T., Logue, D. M., Hinings, B. C. R., & Barrett, M. (2022). Digital Transformation and Institutional Theory: Consequences, opportunities, and challenges. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 83.

Grindle, M. S., & Hilderbrand, M. E. (1995). Building sustainable capacity in the public sector : what can be done ? Public Administration & Development, 15, 441–463.

Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315254234-12

Horton, D., Alexaki, A., Bennett-Lartey, S., Brice, K. N., Campilan, D., Carden, F., Silva, J. de S., Duong, L. T., Khadar, I., Boza, A. M., Muniruzzaman, I. K., Perez, J., Chang, M. S., Vernooy, R., & Watts, J. (2003). Evaluating Capacity Development: Experiences from Research and Development Organizations around the World. The Netherlands: International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR); Canada: International Development Research Centre (IDRC), the Netherlands: ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA).

IBC. (2023). The Critical Importance of Institutional Transformation. https://business-council.id/institutional-transormation/the-critical-importance-of-institutional-transformation/ (Diakses pada tanggal 01 Agustus 2025)

Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. (2002). Examining the institutional transformation process: The importance of sensemaking, interrelated strategies, and balance. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 295–328. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014889001242

Kristiansen, S., & Pratikno. (2006). Decentralising education in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Development, 26(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2005.12.003

Kuhlmann, S., & Heuberger, S. (2021). Institutional Innovation in Local Government: The case of German city Administrations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 87(3), 529–546.

Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2020). Nordic administrative collaboration: Scope, predictors and effects on policy design and administrative reform measures. Politics and Governance, 8(4), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3281

LAN RI. (2019). Evaluasi Kebijakan Penataan Organisasi Kementerian/Lembaga. Pusat Kajian Kebijakan Administrasi Negara.

Milen, A. (2001). What do we know about capacity building? An overview of existing knowledge and good practice. https://doi.org/10.3109/10641969009073509

Peters, B. G. (2000). Institutional Theory: Problems and Prospects (Issue July). http://irihs.

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public Management Review A Comparative Analysis—Into the Age of Austerity. Oxford University Press.

Rasyid Thaha. (2009). Penataan Kelembagaan Pemerintahan Daerah. Government: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 2(1), 39–62.

Ristala, H., & Rahmandika, M. A. (2023). Penyederhanaan Birokrasi dan Transformasi Kelembagaan demi Mewujudkan Pelayanan Publik yang Prima di Lingkungan Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Barat. Academia Praja, 5(1), 1–12. http://suniscome.50webs.com/32 Konsep Pemberdayaan Partisipasi Kelembagaan.pdf%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.36859/jap.xxxx.xxx

Rusliandy. (2022). Analisis Kebijakan Penyederhanaan Birokrasi Pemerintah Daerah. Kolaborasi : Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 8(April), 53–70.

Scott, W. R., & Davis, G. F. (2016). Organizations and Organizing. Rational, Natural, and Open System Perspectives. Routledge - Taylor & Francis Group.

Staroňová, K., & Gajduschek, G. (2019). Guy Peters – Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism. Perspectives from Central and Eastern Europe. In NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy (Vol. 12, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2019-0024

Sururi, A. (2014). Inovasi Kebijakan Publik (Tinjauan Konseptual dan Empiris). Sawala Administrasi Negara, 4(3), 1–14.

Sururi, A. (2017). Inovasi Kebijakan dalam Perspektif Administrasi Publik Menuju Terwujudnya Good Public Policy Governance. Spirit Publik: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 12(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.20961/sp.v12i2.16236

Suryanto, A. (2023). Transformasi Administrasi Publik Menjawab Tantangan di Era Disrupsi, Gaya Pembaharuan dan Praktik Kepemimpunan Prof Dr. Adi Suryanto, S.Sos., M.Si., CHRM. Lembaga Administrasi Negara – Republik Indonesia.

Titin Rohayatin. (2017). Strategi Reformasi Birokrasi Pemerintahan Daerah: Menuju Era Globalisasi. Jurnal Transformative, 3, 40–52. https://transformative.ub.ac.id/index.php/jtr/article/viewFile/22/23

Torfing, J., & Ansell, C. (2017). Strengthening political leadership and policy innovation through the expansion of collaborative forms of governance. Public Management Review, 19(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1200662

Trisnawati. (2016). Reformasi Kelembagaan Pemerintah Daerah. Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents, 1–23.

Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2022). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 43(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1708301

UNDP. (2017). Guidance note: institutional and context analysis for the Sustainable Development Goals (Issue August). United Nations Development Programme. https://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/bpps-spu/INSTITUTIONAL AND CONTEXT ANALYSIS August 2017 CLEAN_rev.pdf

Visser, J. De. (2009). Developmental local government in South Africa: institutional fault lines. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, 2, 7–25. http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/ojs/index.php/cjlg/article/viewArticle/1005

Widanarto, A. (2019). Transformasi Manajemen Pemerintahan Di Kabupaten Sukabumi. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Bhakti Praja, 9(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.33701/jiwbp.v9i1.337