Formulating purchasing strategies with kraljic portfolio matrix: A case study in an investment management company

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30656/jsmi.v8i2.8999

Keywords:

Kraljic portfolio matrix, Procurement, Purchasing, Supplier

Abstract

Procurement is important in a company because it will directly affect how much a company can reduce costs. One of the activities in the procurement process is purchasing. PT XYZ has never conducted a supplier analysis or analysis of items purchased from suppliers. PT XYZ only purchases items daily; if managed properly, it can save the company's expenses and improve supplier relationships. This study aims to formulate purchasing strategies by implementing the Kraljic Portfolio Matrix (KPM). KPM has been widely applied to various cross-sectoral companies to manage suppliers more effectively. KPM divides items provided by suppliers into four quadrants based on supply risk and profit impact to minimize supply risk and maximize purchase profit. Thirty-five sup-pliers were analyzed in this study. The result shows that of the four KPM quadrants, three quadrants are filled, namely the non-critical quadrant (containing 12 suppliers), bottleneck (14), strategic (9), and none of the suppliers located in the leverage quadrant. Purchasing strategies based on these three quadrants are then formulated, and a total of seven strategies are produced. An analysis of the dominance of buyers and suppliers is also given to find out the relationship and balance of power between these parties.

References

S. Khakata, ‘Procurement methods and operational performance of state corporations in Kenya’, University of Nairobi, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/75341

M. Moshtari, N. Altay, J. Heikkilä, and P. Gonçalves, ‘Procurement in humanitarian organizations: Body of knowledge and practitioner’s challenges’, Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 233, p. 108017, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.108017.

P. Kraljic, ‘Purchasing must become supply management’, Harv. Bus. Rev., vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 109–117, 1983, [Online]. Available: https://hbr.org/1983/09/purchasing-must-become-supply-management

A. Dubois and A.-C. Pedersen, ‘Why relationships do not fit into purchasing portfolio models—a comparison between the portfolio and industrial network approaches’, Eur. J. Purch. Supply Manag., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 35–42, 2002, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-7012(01)00014-4.

M. C. J. Caniëls and C. J. Gelderman, ‘Power and interdependence in buyer supplier relationships: A purchasing portfolio approach’, Ind. Mark. Manag., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 219–229, 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.08.012.

C. J. Gelderman and J. Semeijn, ‘Managing the global supply base through purchasing portfolio management’, J. Purch. Supply Manag., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 209–217, 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2006.10.002.

C. J. Gelderman and A. J. Van Weele, ‘Handling measurement issues and strategic directions in Kraljic’s purchasing portfolio model’, J. Purch. Supply Manag., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 207–216, 2003, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2003.07.001.

R. Syson, Improving purchase performance. Pitman London, 1992. [Online]. Available: https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/titel/586329

R. Nellore and K. Söderquist, ‘Portfolio approaches to procurement: Analysing the missing link to specifications’, Long Range Plann., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 245–267, 2000, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(00)00027-3.

F. H. Hesping and H. Schiele, ‘Matching tactical sourcing levers with the Kraljič matrix: Empirical evidence on purchasing portfolios’, Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 177, pp. 101–117, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.04.011.

M. L. J. Boodie, World Class Purchasing in Nederland is fictie en helaas nog geen werkelijkheid. Berenschot Inkoopenquête 1997. The Netherlands, Utrecht: Berenschot, 1997. [Online]. Available: https://www.boekenplatform.nl/world-class-purchasing-nederland-fictie-51028

M. C. J. Caniëls and C. J. Gelderman, ‘Purchasing strategies in the Kraljic matrix—A power and dependence perspective’, J. Purch. Supply Manag., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 141–155, 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2005.10.004.

B. I. Vladislavovna, ‘Applying an İntegrated methodology of Supplier Selection with a Kraljic Matrix-based Strategic Decision-Making Tool.’, Turkish Online J. Qual. Inq., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 146–155, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://www.tojqi.net/index.php/journal/article/view/1149

F. S. Garzon, M. Enjolras, M. Camargo, and L. Morel, ‘A green procurement methodology based on Kraljic Matrix for supplier`s evaluation and selection: a case study from the chemical sector’, Supply Chain Forum An Int. J., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 185–201, Jul. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2019.1622446.

R. Stange, H. Schiele, and J. Henseler, ‘Advancing purchasing as a design science: Publication guidelines to shift towards more relevant purchasing research’, J. Purch. Supply Manag., vol. 28, no. 1, p. 100750, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2022.100750.

C. J. Gelderman and D. R. Mac Donald, ‘Application of Kraljic’s Purchasing Portfolio Matrix in an Undeveloped Logistics Infrastructure: The Staatsolie Suriname Case’, J. Transnatl. Manag., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 77–92, Jun. 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15475770802059610.

S. S. Padhi, S. M. Wagner, and V. Aggarwal, ‘Positioning of commodities using the Kraljic Portfolio Matrix’, J. Purch. Supply Manag., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2011.10.001.

A. Arantes, A. F. Alhais, and L. M. D. F. Ferreira, ‘Application of a purchasing portfolio model to define medicine purchasing strategies: An empirical study’, Socioecon. Plann. Sci., vol. 84, p. 101318, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101318.

Y. Y. Tesfay, ‘The best coordination to Egypt and Ethiopia on the Blue Nile from supply chain performance perspective: an application to Kraljic-Tesfay portfolio model’, Sustain. Water Resour. Manag., vol. 6, no. 4, p. 69, Aug. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-020-00428-1.

B. Tip, F. G. S. Vos, E. Peters, and V. Delke, ‘A Kraljic and competitive rivalry perspective on hospital procurement during a pandemic (COVID-19): a Dutch case study’, J. Public Procure., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 64–88, Jan. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-11-2020-0081.

Muningrum and R. D. Kusumastuti, ‘Categorizing Suppliers in an Indonesian Shipping Company Using Kraljic’s Portfolio Model’, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Michigan, USA: IEOM Society International, Apr. 2021, pp. 1683–1691. doi: https://doi.org/10.46254/SA02.20210636.

Y. Abdillah and S. Hasibuan, ‘Supplier selection decision making in the pharmaceutical industry based on Kraljic portfolio and MAUT method: A Case Study in Indonesia’, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Michigan, USA: IEOM Society International, Mar. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.46254/AN11.20210746.

S. C. S. Maisarah, R. Irfanto, and M. Abduh, ‘Small-sized contractors’ strategies of construction material purchasing in road rehabilitation projects’, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 933, no. 1, p. 12025, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/933/1/012025.

S. K. Putri, H. Suliantoro, and D. Pujotomo, ‘Strategic planning in procurement of raw materials based on Kraljic’s purchasing portofolio model’, in AIP Conference Proceedings, Apr. 2020, p. 030100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000785.

D. Pujotomo, H. Suliantoro, and A. F. Huseina, ‘Procurement Strategy in Power Plant Companies (Case study in the supply of water generator engine parts)’, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 598, no. 1, p. 12022, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/598/1/012022.

M. S. Akbar and S. N. W. Pramono, ‘Vendor Performance Evaluation Using Kraljic’s Purchasing Portfolio Matrix and Analytic Hierarchy Process Method (Case study: PT Pertamina Trans Kontinental Central Jakarta)’, Proceeding Int. Conf. Relig. Sci. Educ., pp. 667–673, Mar. 2024, [Online]. Available: https://sunankalijaga.org/prosiding/index.php/icrse/article/view/1150

H. Suliantoro, D. A. Dilaga, and M. M. Ulkhaq, ‘Formulating strategic purchasing strategy: A case study’, AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2674, no. 1, p. 30025, May 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0114089.

R. T. Montgomery, J. A. Ogden, and B. C. Boehmke, ‘A quantified Kraljic Portfolio Matrix: Using decision analysis for strategic purchasing’, J. Purch. Supply Manag., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 192–203, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2017.10.002.

R. F. Olsen and L. M. Ellram, ‘A portfolio approach to supplier relationships’, Ind. Mark. Manag., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 101–113, 1997, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(96)00089-2.

L.-E. Gadde and I. Snehota, ‘Making the Most of Supplier Relationships’, Ind. Mark. Manag., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 305–316, 2000, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(00)00109-7.

T. L. Tuten and D. J. Urban, ‘An Expanded Model of Business-to-Business Partnership Formation and Success’, Ind. Mark. Manag., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 149–164, 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(00)00140-1.

B. J. Hadeler and J. R. Evans, ‘Supply strategy: Capturing the value.’, Ind. Manag., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 3–4, 1994, [Online]. Available: https://www.proquest.com/docview/211618676.

F. Habib, M. Bastl, and C. Pilbeam, ‘Strategic responses to power dominance in buyer-supplier relationships’, Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag., vol. 45, no. 1/2, pp. 182–203, Jan. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2013-0138.

M. C. J. Caniëls and C. J. Gelderman, ‘Purchasing strategies in the Kraljic matrix—A power and dependence perspective’, J. Purch. Supply Manag., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 141–155, 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2005.10.004.

V. A. G. Tondolo, E. L. Paiva, R. da R. P. Tondolo, and J. B. Santos, ‘Sustainable orientation and purchasing: what about a remanufactured component?’, Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag., vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 1266–1285, Jan. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-06-2021-0323.

R. Thomas, J. L. Darby, D. Dobrzykowski, and R. van Hoek, ‘Decomposing Social Sustainability: Signaling Theory Insights into Supplier Selection Decisions’, J. Supply Chain Manag., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 117–136, Oct. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12247.

M. M. Ulkhaq, R. L. Nartadhi, and P. Y. Akshinta, ‘Evaluating Service Quality of Korean Restaurants: A Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Approach’, Ind. Eng. Manag. Syst., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 77–91, Mar. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.7232/iems.2016.15.1.077.

M. M. Ulkhaq, W. R. Wijayanti, D. A. Dilaga, A. A. Qadarullah, and F. Arfi, ‘Combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Importance-Performance Analysis to Assess Service Quality of m-Commerce: A Case of Indonesian m-Commerce’, in 2021 IEEE 8th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA), IEEE, Apr. 2021, pp. 6–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEA52957.2021.9436718.

M. M. Ulkhaq, A. D. Siamiaty, A. Handoko, S. A. Madjid, and D. ‘Sa Nu, ‘The Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process for Prioritizing the Sustainable Tourism Attitude Scale’, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 219, no. 1, p. 12012, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/219/1/012012.

S. N. W. Pramono et al., ‘Integrating the analytic hierarchy process and importance-performance analysis into ISO 14001 framework for assessing campus sustainability’, in AIP Conference Proceedings, Nov. 2017, p. 020035. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5010652.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-05

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

[1]
“Formulating purchasing strategies with kraljic portfolio matrix: A case study in an investment management company ”, j. sist. manaj. ind., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 119–128, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.30656/jsmi.v8i2.8999.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.