Evolutionary Study of Bureaucracy Research From 2014 to 2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30656/sawala.v12i12.9794Keywords:
Bureaucracy, Evolutionary Study, VOSViewerAbstract
The aim of this study was to analyse the bibliographic characteristics and content of articles on Bureaucracy published in journals indexed by Scopus written by researchers from throughout the world. We conducted a bibliometric and content analysis of publication in the Scopus database. We only retrieved articles written in English. We conducted content analysis using the VOSviewer software and visualized the co-occurrence of keywords and bibliographic coupling of sources and countries. Following the study protocol, we found 1910 articles on Bureaucracy over the past 10 years. The most productive journal that published these articles was Research Handbook On Street Level Bureaucracy The Ground Floor Of Government In Context (n=26). The post productive country were United States (n=515). Based on cititations, The most influential document was Policy Implementation, Street-level Bureaucracy, and the Importance of Discretion with 316 citations. The keywords of research on Bureaucracy formed 6 clusters (e.g Bureaucracy, Human, Humans). From a global perspective, Bureaucracy research in the past one decades has increased significantly.
References
D. Lee, “Bibliometric Analysis of Korean Journals in Arts and Kinesiology – from the Perspective of Authorship,” J. Inf. Sci. Theory Pract., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 15–29, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1633/JISTaP.2020.8.3.2.
S. Mifrah, “Toward a Semantic Graph of Scientific Publications: A Bibliometric Study,” Int. J. Adv. Trends Comput. Sci. Eng., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 3323–3330, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.30534/ijatcse/2020/129932020.
O. Omoregbe, A. N. Mustapha, R. Steinberger-Wilckens, A. El-Kharouf, and H. Onyeaka, “Carbon capture technologies for climate change mitigation: A bibliometric analysis of the scientific discourse during 1998–2018,” Energy Reports, vol. 6, pp. 1200–1212, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.05.003.
G. Saravanan and J. Dominic, “A Ten-year Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends in Three Leading Ecology Journals during 2003-2012,” J. Inf. Sci. Theory Pract., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 40–54, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1633/jistap.2014.2.3.4.
P. Akhavan, N. A. Ebrahim, M. A. Fetrati, and A. Pezeshkan, “Major trends in knowledge management research: a bibliometric study,” Scientometrics, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 1249–1264, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1938-x.
P. B. Putera, S. Suryanto, S. Ningrum, and I. Widianingsih, “A bibliometric analysis of articles on innovation systems in Scopus journals written by authors from Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia,” Sci. Ed., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 177–183, 2020, doi: 10.6087/KCSE.214.
L. Tummers and V. Bekkers, “Policy Implementation, Street-level Bureaucracy, and the Importance of Discretion,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 527–547, 2014, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.841978.
N. M. Riccucci, G. G. Van Ryzin, and C. F. Lavena, “Representative bureaucracy in policing: Does it increase perceived legitimacy?,” J. Public Adm. Res. Theory, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 537–551, 2014, doi: 10.1093/jopart/muu006.
S. O. Becker, K. Boeckh, C. Hainz, and L. Woessmann, “The Empire Is Dead, Long Live the Empire! Long-Run Persistence of Trust and Corruption in the Bureaucracy,” Econ. J., vol. 126, no. 590, pp. 40–74, 2016, doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12220.
A. S. Binderkrantz, P. M. Christiansen, and H. H. Pedersen, “Interest Group Access to the Bureaucracy, Parliament, and the Media,” Governance, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 95–112, 2015, doi: 10.1111/gove.12089.
P. Hupe and A. Buffat, “A Public Service Gap: Capturing contexts in a comparative approach of street-level bureaucracy,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 548–569, 2014, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.854401.
N. M. Riccucci and G. G. Van Ryzin, “Representative Bureaucracy: A Lever to Enhance Social Equity, Coproduction, and Democracy,” Public Adm. Rev., vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2017, doi: 10.1111/puar.12649.
A. Buffat, “Street-Level Bureaucracy and E-Government,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 149–161, 2015, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.771699.
G. G. Van Ryzin, “Riccucci_et_al-2016-Public_Administration_Review,” Public Adm. Rev., vol. 76, pp. 121–130, 2015, doi: 10.1111/puar.12401.Representative.
A. Cordella and N. Tempini, “E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 279–286, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.005.
J. Jiang, “Making Bureaucracy Work: Patronage Networks, Performance Incentives, and Economic Development in China,” Am. J. Pol. Sci., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 982–999, 2018, doi: 10.1111/ajps.12394.
K. J. Meier, “Theoretical Frontiers in Representative Bureaucracy: New Directions for Research,” Perspect. Public Manag. Gov., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 39–56, 2019, doi: 10.1093/ppmgov/gvy004.
J. A. Grissom, E. C. Kern, and L. A. Rodriguez, “The ‘Representative Bureaucracy’ in Education: Educator Workforce Diversity, Policy Outputs, and Outcomes for Disadvantaged Students,” Educ. Res., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 185–192, 2015, doi: 10.3102/0013189X15580102.
S. Dahlberg and S. Holmberg, “Democracy and Bureaucracy: How their Quality Matters for Popular Satisfaction,” West Eur. Polit., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 515–537, 2014, doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.830468.
B. Kennedy, “Unraveling Representative Bureaucracy: A Systematic Analysis of the Literature,” Adm. Soc., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 395–421, 2014, doi: 10.1177/0095399712459724.
T. Hustedt and H. H. Salomonsen, “Ensuring political responsiveness: politicization mechanisms in ministerial bureaucracies,” Int. Rev. Adm. Sci., vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 746–765, 2014, doi: 10.1177/0020852314533449.
J. B. Bullock, “Artificial Intelligence, Discretion, and Bureaucracy,” Am. Rev. Public Adm., vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 751–761, 2019, doi: 10.1177/0275074019856123.
S. Eckhard and J. Ege, “International bureaucracies and their influence on policy-making: a review of empirical evidence,” J. Eur. Public Policy, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 960–978, 2016, doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1162837.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Riki Satia Muharam, Ufa Anita Afrilia, Syifa Rachmania Komara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
