Analysis Of Formulation Of Government Internal Supervisory System Policy Using Regulatory Impact Assessment

Ariesca Kamajaya Suryaman; Umanto

doi:10.30656/sawala.v13.i1.10402

Authors

Ariesca Kamajaya Suryaman Universitas Indonesia
Umanto Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30656/sawala.v13.i1.10402

Keywords:

Regulatory Impact Assessment, Government Internal Supervisory System, Internal Audit Function, Government Internal Audit

Abstract

The high level of corruption in government makes the effectiveness of supervision from the government's internal control apparatus (APIP) questionable. The current supervisory system that makes APIP less independent is one of the causes of APIP being less than optimal in carrying out its duties and functions. Improving the government's internal supervision system is a discourse that needs to be considered. This study aims to analyze the preparation of government internal supervisory system policies through Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA). RIA is a useful method in policy formulation to analyze the impact of policies more comprehensively in developing optimal policies. This article uses a qualitative method that aims to understand and explain the process of drafting government internal supervisory system policy in several stages of RIA. The results show that the government has implemented several stages of RIA although there are still shortcomings. The regulation of the government's internal supervisory system is needed to increase the role and independence of APIP. However, the government still needs to increase stakeholder involvement, conduct a cost-benefit analysis, and develop a policy implementation strategy so that the regulations can have an optimal impact.

References

Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan. (2021). Peraturan BPKP Nomor 8 Tahun 2021 tentang Penilaian Kapabilitas APIP pada Kementerian/Lembaga/Pemerintah Daerah. Diakses dari https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/242789/peraturan-bpkp-no-8-tahun-2021

Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembanguna (2023). Laporan Kinerja BPKP Tahun 2023

Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan. (2024). APIP Perlu Transformasi Pengawasan untuk Mendukung Pembangunan. [Online] available from https://www.bpkp.go.id/id/berita/nv2z/apip-perlu-transformasi-pengawasan-untuk-mendukung-pembangunan [Assessed 18th February 2025].

Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat. Detail Rancangan Undang-Undang tentang Sistem Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah. [Online] available from https://puuekkukesra.dpr.go.id/simas-puu/detail-ruu/id/60. [Assessed 18th February 2025].

Ege, M. S. (2015). Does Internal Audit Function Quality Deter Management Misconduct? The Accounting Review, 90(2), 495–527. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50871

FIA, UI. (2017). Perkuat Sistem Pengawasan Internal Pemerintah Melalui Penguatan Integritas dan Profesionalisme. [Online] available from https://fia.ui.ac.id/perkuat-sistem-pengawasan-internal-pemerintah-melalui-penguatan-integritas-dan-profesionalisme/. [Assessed 18th February 2025].

Kementerian Keuangan. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 151 Tahun 2022 tentang Standar Biaya Keluaran Tahun Anggaran Tahun 2023.

Kementerian PAN dan RB. (2013). APIP Sebaiknya Independen. [Online] available from https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/apip-sebaiknya-independen. [Assessed 18th February 2025].

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2024). KPK Dorong Penguatan APIP untuk Akselerasi Pencegahan Korupsi di Daerah. [Online] available from https://www.kpk.go.id/id/ruang-informasi/berita/kpk-dorong-penguatan-apip-untuk-akselerasi-pencegahan-korupsi-di-daerah. [Assessed 18th February 2025].

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2025). Publikasi Data Statistik Pendindakan [Online] available from https://kpk.go.id/id/publikasi-data/statistik/penindakan-2 [Assessed 18th February 2025].

Kirkpatrick, C., & Parker, D. (2004). Regulatory impact assessment and regulatory governance in developing countries. Public Administration and Development, 24(4), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.310

Kurniawan, T., Muslim, M. A., & Sakapurnama, E. (2018). Regulatory impact assessment and its challenges: An empirical analysis from Indonesia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(1), 105–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.12.004

NH Dwi, and Gewati, Mikhael. (2024). Kemendagri Perkuat Fungsi APIP untuk Berantas Korupsi di Pemda. [Online] available from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/07/08/21154541/kemendagri-perkuat-fungsi-apip-untuk-berantas-korupsi-di-pemda. [Assessed 18th February 2025].

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2008). Introductory Handbook for Undertaking Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA)

Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara

Republik Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemeriksaan Pengelolaan dan Tanggung Jawab Keuangan Negara

Republik Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2023 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara

Republik Indonesia. (2008). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 60 Tahun 2008 tentang Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah. Diakses dari https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/4876

Republik Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2020 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional 2020-2024. RI. https://jdih.bappenas.go.id/peraturan/detailperaturan/1037

Republik Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Retnosari, A., & Syaif, H. R. A. (2024). Penerapan Regulatory Impact Assessment dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan: Suatu Kewajiban atau Saran? CAKRAWALA, 18(1), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.32781/cakrawala.v18i1.664

Riski, Petrus. (2021). Lemahnya Pengawasan Sebabkan Tingginya Korupsi di Kalangan ASN. [Online] available from https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/lemahnya-pengawasan-sebabkan-tingginya-korupsi-di-kalangan-asn/5858258.html. [Assessed 18th February 2025].

Safitri, Eva. (2024). Prabowo Sentil Birokrasi Lambat, Ribet dan Sering Mempersulit. [Online] available from https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7602886/prabowo-sentil-birokrasi-lambat-ribet-dan-sering-mempersulit. [Assessed 18th February 2025].

Silaban, A. D., Wynne, Y., Pasaribu, M., & Shalma, F. (2020). The Effectiveness on the Realization of the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus Function to the Implementation of Regional Government. https://doi.org/10.25134/unifikasi.v7i1.2821

The Asia Foundation. (2008). Pedoman Penerapan Regulatory Impact Assessment. BAPPENAS RI.