Analyzing operational risks of a recyclable waste-based payment public transit system in Surabaya, Indonesia

Maria Anityasari; Naning Aranti Wessiani; Atikah Aghdhi Pratiwi; Fathaliati Zikri Musev Putri; Hilmi Cahya Rinardi; Matheus Bimo Aryo Prakoso; Nofinda Ghaisani

doi:10.30656/jsmi.v9i1.10203

Authors

Maria Anityasari Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Naning Aranti Wessiani Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Atikah Aghdhi Pratiwi Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Fathaliati Zikri Musev Putri Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Hilmi Cahya Rinardi Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Matheus Bimo Aryo Prakoso Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Nofinda Ghaisani Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30656/jsmi.v9i1.10203

Keywords:

Public transportation, Operational risk analysis, Failure mode and effect analysis, Benefit-cost analysis, Recyclable waste payment

Abstract

Suroboyo Bus, a municipal public transportation initiative managed by the Surabaya Department of Transportation (SubDOT) in Indonesia, was launched to promote the use of public transit by accepting recyclable plastic waste as transit fare payments. However, this transportation system presented challenges, as prior to 2019, Suroboyo Bus performed its operational activities without adequately incorporating operational risk, specifically considering Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE) factors. The analysis of risk profiles and a mitigation plan concerning the well-being of both their staff and passengers was uncomprehensive. To address these issues, this paper evaluates the operational risk based on ISO 31000:2018, the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), and the Benefit Cost-Analysis (BCA). The analysis identified 114 risks and 189 combinations of risks and impacts across 70 business processes associated with Suroboyo Bus operations, with varying degrees of risk severity. Risk prioritization analysis was performed using the Pareto 80:20 principle. Proposed risk response strategies include avoidance, mitigation, transfer, and tolerance. Evaluation of the feasibility of these strategies through benefits and cost analysis, supplemented by a sensitivity analysis, revealed Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) values ranging from 1.041 to 1.471, indicating that the proposed mitigation plan is feasible for all evaluated scenarios. These findings underscore the importance of implementing risk mitigation measures to improve the sustainability and effectiveness of the Suroboyo Bus service. Future research should explore the digital application developed for Suroboyo Bus passengers as part of the business process named “Golek Bis” (GOBIS) and other methods that can be used to enhance the quality and comprehensiveness of risk management.

Downloads

References

[1] P. Miller, A. G. de Barros, L. Kattan, and S. C. Wirasinghe, “Public transportation and sustainability: A review,” KSCE J. Civ. Eng., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1076–1083, Apr. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0705-0.

[2] A. E. Ojo, “Sustainable infrastructure for Nigeria’s sustainable economic development: whither transportation or electric power supply?,” J. Mega Infrastruct. Sustain. Dev., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 248–261, Nov. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/24724718.2021.2012364.

[3] Z. Ma, C. Shao, S. Ma, and Z. Ye, “Constructing road safety performance indicators using Fuzzy Delphi Method and Grey Delphi Method,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1509–1514, Mar. 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.062.

[4] Y. Shiomi, K. Watanabe, H. Nakamura, and H. Akahane, “Assessing Safety of Signalized Intersections: Influence of Geometric Attributes and Regionality on Traffic Accident Risk,” Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, vol. 2659, no. 1, pp. 71–79, Jan. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/2659-08.

[5] M. Hosseinpour, A. S. Yahaya, S. M. Ghadiri, and J. Prasetijo, “Application of Adaptive Neuro-fuzzy Inference System for road accident prediction,” KSCE J. Civ. Eng., vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1761–1772, Nov. 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0036-3.

[6] M. Gebremichael et al., “Prevalence and determinants of road traffic injuries in Ethiopia: Based on the 2015 STEPS survey findings,” Ethiop. J. Heal. Dev., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 340–347, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ejhd/article/view/167824

[7] J. Zhang, Y. Tu, J. Liu, L. Liu, and Z. Li, “Regional public transportation safety risk grading assessment under time dimension: A case study of Chinese mainland,” Transp. Policy, vol. 126, pp. 343–354, Sep. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.08.003.

[8] A. Olechowski, J. Oehmen, W. Seering, and M. Ben-Daya, “The professionalization of risk management: What role can the ISO 31000 risk management principles play?,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1568–1578, Nov. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.002.

[9] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 31000:2009. Geneva, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/43170.html

[10] International Standard Organization, “ISO 31000:2018 Risk Management – Guidelines,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/iso-31000-risk-management.html

[11] K. de Bakker, A. Boonstra, and H. Wortmann, “Does risk management contribute to IT project success? A meta-analysis of empirical evidence,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 493–503, Jul. 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.07.002.

[12] A. Geramian, A. Shahin, B. Minaei, and J. Antony, “Enhanced FMEA: An integrative approach of fuzzy logic-based FMEA and collective process capability analysis,” J. Oper. Res. Soc., vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 800–812, May 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1606986.

[13] M. Hekmatpanah, A. Shahin, and N. Ravichandran, “The application of FMEA in the oil industry: The case of four litre oil canning process,” African J. Bus. Manag., vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 3019–3027, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://academicjournals.org/journal/AJBM/article-abstract/96A7F0C30642

[14] X. Qu, Q. Meng, V. Yuanita, and Y. H. Wong, “Design and implementation of a quantitative risk assessment software tool for Singapore road tunnels,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 14664–14675, May 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.186.

[15] P. Liu, M. Shen, and Y. Geng, “Risk assessment based on failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) and WASPAS methods under probabilistic double hierarchy linguistic term sets,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 186, p. 109758, Dec. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109758.

[16] Y. Rahimi, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, S. H. Iranmanesh, and M. Vaez-Alaei, “Hybrid Approach to Construction Project Risk Management with Simultaneous FMEA/ISO 31000/Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Optimization Study,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 144, no. 6, Jun. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001486.

[17] P. Hopkin, Fundamentals of Risk Management: Understanding, Evaluating, and Implementing Effective Risk Management. Croydon, UK: Institute of Risk Management, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=NznCjwEACAAJ&dq

[18] J. M. Juran and J. A. Defeo, Juran’s Quality Handbook: The Complete Guide to Performance Excellence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=JPCz0LoMnLsC&q

[19] R. Miller and D. Lessard, “Understanding and managing risks in large engineering projects,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 437–443, Nov. 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00045-X.

[20] R. Dunford, Q. Su, E. Tamang, and A. Wintour, “The Pareto principle,” Plymouth Student Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 140–148, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1272&context=tpss

[21] I. Ben-David and T. Raz, “An integrated approach for risk response development in project planning,” J. Oper. Res. Soc., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 14–25, Jan. 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601029.

[22] P. X. W. Zou, G. Zhang, and J. Wang, “Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 601–614, Aug. 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.001.

[23] Y. Zhang and Z.-P. Fan, “An optimization method for selecting project risk response strategies,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 412–422, Apr. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.06.006.

[24] A. Bosque and F. Schaffner, “Communicating environmental risks in developing countries,” in Environmental and Human Health, CRC Press, 2010, pp. 27–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1201/b10540-7.

[25] M. C. Hoyos and V. Silva, “Exploring benefit cost analysis to support earthquake risk mitigation in Central America,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 80, p. 103162, Oct. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103162.

[26] BPS, “Proyeksi Penduduk Kabupaten Kota Provinsi jawa timur 2015-2025. [Online]. Available: https://jatim.bps.go.id/publication/2019/04/17/12197434047d37c17efe921e/proyeksi-penduduk-kabupaten-kota-provinsi-jawa-timur-2015-2025--hasil-supas2015-.html

[27] J. Farrington and C. Farrington, “Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: towards conceptualisation,” J. Transp. Geogr., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Mar. 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.10.002.

[28] J. McDonagh, “Transport policy instruments and transport-related social exclusion in rural Republic of Ireland,” J. Transp. Geogr., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 355–366, Sep. 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2005.06.005.

[29] R. Cascajo and A. Monzon, “Assessment of innovative measures implemented in European bus systems using key performance indicators,” Public Transp., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 257–282, Oct. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-014-0085-0.

[30] A. Candelieri, B. G. Galuzzi, I. Giordani, and F. Archetti, “Vulnerability of public transportation networks against directed attacks and cascading failures,” Public Transp., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 27–49, Jun. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-018-00193-7.

[31] A. Imaz, K. M. Nurul Habib, A. Shalaby, and A. O. Idris, “Investigating the factors affecting transit user loyalty,” Public Transp., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 39–60, Mar. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-014-0088-x.

[32] A. S. Mikhaylov, I. S. Gumenuk, and A. A. Mikhaylova, “Russian public transport system: the customers’ feedback on the service provision,” Public Transp., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 125–141, Mar. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-015-0111-x.

[33] U. R. de Oliveira, F. A. S. Marins, H. M. Rocha, and V. A. P. Salomon, “The ISO 31000 standard in supply chain risk management,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 151, pp. 616–633, May 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.054.

[34] E. Evinia and M. N. N. Sitokdana, “Risk Management Based IT Analysis Using ISO 31000 (Case Study: PT Bawen Mediatama),” J. Inf. Syst. Informatics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 380–390, Mar. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v5i1.420.

[35] P. Liu, Y. Wu, Y. Li, and X. Wu, “An improved FMEA method based on the expert trust network for maritime transportation risk management,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 238, p. 121705, Mar. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121705.

[36] S. S. Alizadeh, Y. Solimanzadeh, S. Mousavi, and G. H. Safari, “Risk assessment of physical unit operations of wastewater treatment plant using fuzzy FMEA method: a case study in the northwest of Iran,” Environ. Monit. Assess., vol. 194, no. 9, p. 609, Sep. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10248-9.

[37] Institute of Risk Management, A Risk Practitioners Guide to ISO 31000:2018. IRM, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://www.demarcheiso17025.com/document/A Risk Practitioners Guide to ISO 31000 %96 2018.pdf

[38] T. Merna and F. F. Al-Thani, Corporate Risk Management. Wiley, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=yow0EAAAQBAJ

[39] P. Bhattacharjee, V. Dey, and U. K. Mandal, “Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) using interval number based BWM—MCDM approach: Risk Expected Value (REV) method,” Soft Comput., vol. 26, no. 22, pp. 12667–12688, Nov. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07264-9.

[40] Z. Hua, X. Jing, and L. Martínez, “An ELICIT information-based ORESTE method for failure mode and effect analysis considering risk correlation with GRA-DEMATEL,” Inf. Fusion, vol. 93, pp. 396–411, May 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.01.012.

[41] B. O. Ceylan, “Shipboard compressor system risk analysis by using rule-based fuzzy FMEA for preventing major marine accidents,” Ocean Eng., vol. 272, p. 113888, Mar. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113888.

[42] H. Reda and A. Dvivedi, “Decision-making on the selection of lean tools using fuzzy QFD and FMEA approach in the manufacturing industry,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 192, p. 116416, Apr. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116416.

[43] K. A. bin Abdullah, J. bin M. Rohani, and M. S. bin Ngadiman, “Development of FMEA information system for manufacturing industry,” in 3rd International Conference on Modeling and Analysis of Semiconductor Manufacturing, Johor, 2005. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260052683

[44] P. Thomas, R. B. Bratvold, and B. J. Eric, “The Risk of Using Risk Matrices,” in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE, Sep. 2013. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/166269-MS.

[45] G. Shively, “An overview of benefit-cost analysis,” 2012, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255661807

[46] P. Schueler and B. Buckley, Re-Engineering Clinical Trials. Elsevier, 2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-09871-4.

[47] M. von Rosing and J. Erasmus, “Variation in Business Processes,” in The Complete Business Process Handbook, M. Von Rosing and J. Erasmus, Eds., Elsevier, 2015, pp. 459–478. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-799959-3.00022-7.

[48] G. de Rus, Introduction to Cost-Benefit Analysis: Looking for Reasonable Shortcuts. Edward Elgar, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=WRBJacb0-40C

[49] M. Bonet, “Ley de Pareto aplicada a la fiabilidad,” Ing. Mecánica, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1–9, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=225118188010