c

Dear Dr.  at 

I hope that this email finds you well.

I am Supriyadi. the editor-in-chief of Jurnal Sistem dan Manajemen Industri (Journal System and Management of Industries), a journal on Industrial Engineering published by Universitas Serang Raya (Indonesia).

We currently have an article entitled Analysis Aircraft Components Industry Recovery in Indonesia: Delphi - Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) Method. Considering your expertise in Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) issues, I would like to invite you to serve as the Reviewer in our journal to review the article.

Abstract
The Indonesian aircraft component industry has experienced significant pressure, particularly due to production and distribution restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in decreased production capacity and financial disruption. This study aims to analyze key factors for industrial recovery by identifying and modeling important factors for the recovery of the Indonesian aircraft component industry. This study is supported by the Industrial Recovery theory with a qualitative descriptive statistical method approach with eight experts. The Delphi method and Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) were used in this study to obtain expert consensus and map causal and hierarchical relationships between factors. A total of 18 factors were identified from the literature and expert assessments, resulting in 9 key factors, including Production Capacity (A1), Human Resource Competence (A2), Supply Chain Stability (A3), High Manufacturing Technology (A4), Certification and Regulatory Compliance (A5), Market Demand (A6), Government Stimulus (A7), Funding and Liquidity (A8), and Transparency and Financial Governance (A9). The MICMAC analysis shows that Human Resource Competence (A2) and Government Stimulus (A7) are the main foundations of recovery, while Market Demand (A6) is the main driver of capacity building and innovation. The main findings reveal that key factors for industrial recovery fall into four groups: autonomous, interconnected, dependent, and driving. Furthermore, the findings reveal five hierarchical levels of relationships among recovery factors in the aircraft component industry. The order of practical application of industrial recovery factors ascends from level five to level one. The practical implication of these findings is the development of a strategic model that can serve as a reference for policymakers and industry players in designing integrated policies and strategies to accelerate transformation and increase the competitiveness of the national aircraft component industry in the global market.

We apologize for interrupting your time.

Sincerely,
Supriyadi
Managing Editor
Jurnal Sistem dan Manajemen Industri (Journal System and Management of Industries)
http://e-jurnal.lppmunsera.org/index.php/JSMI
+6285945511980