REGIONAL ACTION PLAN DESIGN BASED ON COLLABORATION BETWEEN GOVERNMENT, BUSINESS, AND COMMUNITY IN STRENGTHENING CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30656/jika.v5i2.11541Keywords:
corporate social responsibility, regional action plan, collaborative governanceAbstract
Problems: The implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) at the regional level has shown significant progress, but is not yet fully focused on supporting the sustainable development agenda. Many CSR programs are fragmented, not aligned with regional planning documents, and are not managed through collaborative mechanisms that equally involve government, businesses, and communities.
Purpose: To provide a description and analysis of how government, businesses, and communities collaborate to strengthen corporate social responsibility.
Methodology: This study uses a qualitative approach through document analysis, literature review, and conceptual modeling to formulate a Regional Action Plan (RAD) design based on multi-stakeholder collaboration.
Findings: The research findings indicate that strengthening coordination between actors, data system integration, and social accountability mechanisms are key prerequisites for the effectiveness of the CSR RAD. The resulting design positions local governments as the driving force behind orchestrating collaboration, enabling CSR to be more focused, inclusive, and provide tangible benefits to the community.
Research Type: Qualitative
Keywords: corporate social responsibility, regional action plan, collaborative governance
Downloads
References
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
Bappenas. (2023). Laporan Kinerja Kementerian PPN/Bappenas Tahun 2023. https://perpustakaan.bappenas.go.id
Brantas Abipraya. (2022). Laporan Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan 2022. https://www.brantas-abipraya.co.id/id/tanggung-jawab-sosial/laporan
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2015). Creating public value in practice: Advancing collaborative governance. Public Administration Review.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.
Cornwall, A. (2021). Participation in theory and practice: Revisiting Arnstein’s ladder. Community Development Journal, 56(1), 8–25.
Dubiński, P., Stawicka, E., & Mazur, B. (2022). Corporate social responsibility in the era of sustainability transformation. Sustainability, 14(2), 1011.
Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press.
Farouq, M. M., Kriyantono, R., Hakim, M. L., & Sahiruddin. (2024). Poverty alleviation through sociocultural education programs to improve community welfare. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Education Innovation and Social Science, 234–240.
Fox, J. (2015). Social accountability: What does the evidence really say? World Development, 72, 346–361.
Freeman, R. E., Phillips, R. A., & Sisodia, R. (2020). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.
Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522.
Hanif, N. A., Atmojo, M. E., Rochmah, F., Hakim, M. L., & Putri, S. W. N. C. (2023). Challenges of Indonesia digitalization government in disruptive era. Proceedings of ICSP 2023, 223–232.
ISO. (2010). ISO 26000: Guidance on social responsibility. International Organization for Standardization.
Kementerian BUMN. (2021). Peraturan Menteri BUMN Nomor PER-05/MBU/04/2021 tentang Program Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan BUMN. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id
Kementerian PPN/Bappenas. (2020). RPJMN 2020–2024: Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional. https://www.bappenas.go.id
Kitchin, R. (2021). Data governance: Concepts and frameworks. Journal of Urban Management, 10(2), 15–25.
MIND ID. (2023). TJSL/Sustainability Report 2023. https://mind.id
Nutley, S., Walter, I., & Davies, H. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Policy Press.
Osborne, S. P. (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge.
Osborne, S. P. (2021). Public service logic: Creating value through public service delivery. Routledge.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2012). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 47 Tahun 2012 tentang Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan Perseroan Terbatas. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id
PLN. (2022). Sustainability Report 2022. https://web.pln.co.id
Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2017). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 59 Tahun 2017 tentang Pelaksanaan Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id
Purwanto, E. A., Muzwardi, A., & lainnya. (2022). Multi-stakeholder collaboration in local development: Institutional challenges and opportunities. Journal of Regional Administration, 12(2), 155–170.
Qurbani, I. D., Hakim, M. L., & Syakur, Z. A. (2024). Community empowerment in forest management through community-based forestry management arrangements. Proceedings of BIC 2023, 254–262.
Sinkovics, N., Hoque, S. F., & Sinkovics, R. (2021). The role of CSR in supporting the SDGs: A systematic review. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 17(1), 1–19.
UN Global Compact. (2020). The Ten Principles of the United Nations Global Compact. https://www.unglobalcompact.org
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. (2007). Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id
Van Zanten, J., & Van Tulder, R. (2021). Towards nexus-based governance for the SDGs: Lessons from business–SDG interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 939–955.
Wijaya, A., Pratama, R., & Gunawan, A. W. (2022). Corporate alignment with SDGs in Indonesia: Patterns and implications. Journal of Sustainable Development Policy, 14(3), 112–128.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
