Merancang Nilai Ambang Batas Seleksi Kompetensi Bidang Pengadaan PPPK Studi Empiris Pada Jabatan Fungsional Kementerian Kelautan Dan Perikanan
Article Sidebar
PDF Download : 1359 Times
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article discusses how to design the passing grade of field competency selection (SKB) for the needs of the recruitment process for prospective Government Employees with a Work Agreement (PPPK) who will fill the formation of Functional Positions at the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (KKP). The absence of government guidelines in designing the passing grade value for PPPK candidates triggers Ministries/Institution to design the passing grade value SKB as a necessity in the recruitment process. Research through empirical studies designed the passing grade value SKB for the KKP Functional Position using the Ebel method approach, the Trial Method, and the Judgment Method. The results of the study reveal that the technique of designing the the passing grade value SKB is very dependent on the technical policy of preparing questions so that it is easier, more precise in considering the standard setting method approach or determining the method approach to designing the passing grade value SKB.The passing grade value SKB for the Functional Position of the KKP Guiding Agency based on the three methods obtained results that have close values or differences that are not too significant. The range of values between the interval 45 – 55 absolute numbers. This data indicates that between the technical policy of problem formulation and determining the Ebel method as an approach to the standard setting method in designing the passing grade value is correct and inline.
Keywords: PPPK, Passing Grade Value, Methods Approach
Downloads
Article Details
Chang, Lei, Wim J. Van Der Linden, dan Hans J. Vos, Setting Standard and Detecting Intrajudge Inconsistensy Using Interdeendent Evaluation of Response Alternatives, Journal of Education and Psychologycal of Measurement, Vol. 64, No. 5, October 2004: 781-801. http://epm.sagepub.com/content/64/5/781.abstract (diakses 10 Maret 2013).
Cizek, Gregory J., dan Michael B. Bunch. 2007, Standard Setting: A Guide to Establishing and Evaluating Performance Standard on Test. California: Sage Publications, Inc., 2007.
Cizek, Gregory J. 2001, Setting Performance Standards: Concepts, Methods, and Perspectives. London: Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2001.
Ebel, Robert L. 1972. Essentials of educational measurement. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Glass, C.A.W., van der Linden, W. J., Hambleton, R. K. 1997. A Step Model to Analyze Partial Credit. In Hambleton,
Gary Skaggs dan Serge F. Hein, http://epm.sagepub.com/content/71/3/571, (diakses, 4 April 2014). Guemen Lee, http://epm.sagepub.com/content/68/4/603, (diakses, 4 April 2014).
Goodwin, L.D. 1996. Relation between abserved item difficulty levels and Angoff minimum passing levels for a group of borderline examniness. Applied Measurement in Education, 12, 13-28.
Hambleton, K.R., van der Linden W.J. 1991. Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. New York: Sage Publications.
Hattie, J.A., & Brown. G.T.L. Standard setting for asTTle Reading: A Comparison of Method. asTTle Technecal Report #21, (2003 August), University Aukland/Ministery of Education.
Huynh, Huynh, 1998. A Clarification on The Response Probability Criterion RP67 for Standard Setting Based on Bookmark and Item Maping, Educational Measurement: Issue and Practice, vol 25.
Hambleton, Ronald K & Pitoniak, Mary J. (2006). Setting Performance Standards dalam Brennan, L. Robert. Educational Measurement (Fourth Edition), American Council on Education.p. 433-470.
Herbenu PC. 2007. Pengembangan sumberdaya petugas penyuluh lapangan PPL pertanian guna menghadapi persaingan dan meraih peluang kerja. Jurnal Ilmi-Ilmu Pertanian. Vol. 3 (1): 1-11.
Impara James C. & Plake Barbara S. 2000. A Comparison of Cut Scores using Multiple Standard Setting Methods. Paper presented at the Large Scale Assessment Conference. Snowbird, UT June, 2000. at http://www.unl.edu/BIACO/coop/Isac/aeramillardsimpfinal .pdf diambil tanggal 27 November 2005
Jaeger, R. M. 1989. Selection of judges for standard-setting. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(2), 3-6, 10.
Jihad, Asep,2008, Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogjakarta: Multi Pressindo, 2008.
K.R & vander Linden W.J. (eds, 1997), Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. New York: Springer.
Lewis, D.M., Patz, R.J., & Green, D.R. 1998. The Bookmark Procedure: Psychological Perspectives. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Mitzel, H. C., Lewis, D. M., Patz, R. J., & Green, D. R. 2001.
Mahwah, NJ. Nedelsky, L. 1954. Absolute grading standards for objective test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 14, 3-19.
Marliati, Sumardjo, Asngari PSA Prabowo, dan Asep. 2008. Faktor-faktor penentu peningkatan kinerja penyuluh pertanian dalam memberdayakan petani: kasus di Kabupaten Kampar Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Penyuluhan. Vol. 4 (2): 9299.
Mardapi, Djemari. Standard Setting. http://staff.uny.ac.id/dosen/prof-djemari- mardapi-mpd-phd (diakses 10 Maret 2012).
Plake B. S., Impara, J. C., & Irwin, P. 2000. Consistency of Angoff-based predictions of item performance: Evidence of technical quality of results from the Angoff standard setting method. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37(4), 347–355.
Purwanto, M. Ngalim. Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2000.
Retnawati, Heri. Menentukan Batas Kelulusan (Standard Setting) pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika dengan Metode Angoff. Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA UNY, http://www.docjax.com/document/view. shtml?id= 1076777&title=Menentukan%20Batas%20Kelulusan %20- %20Staff%20Site%20Universitas%20Negeri%20. (diakses10 Maret 2012).
Ricker, K. L. 2009. Setting Cut Scores: Critical Review of Angoff and Modified-Angoff Methods. Edmonton (Alberta, Canada): Centre for Research in Applied Measurement and Evaluation University of Alberta.
The Bookmark Procedure: Psychological Perspectives. In G.J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting Performance Standards.
Wilson, Mark, George Engelhard, Jr., Karen Draney. 1997. Objective Measurement: Theory IntoPractice, Greenwich CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation. 1997.
Cizek, G., J. (2001). Conjungture on the rise and call of standard setting: An introduction to context and practice, in setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives, Gregory J. Cizek ed., New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated, Pub. Mahwah.
Cizek, G. J., Bunch, B., B. (2007). Standard setting: a guide to establising and evaluating performance standard on test. ND: Sage Publications.
Cizek, G. J. (1996). Setting passing scores [Versi Elektronik]. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice, 20-31.
Crocer, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. NY: The Dryden Press Saunders College Publising.
Hambleton, R. K., Pitoniak, M. J. (2006). Educational measurement (4th Ed), R.L Brenan ed., USA: American Council on Education and Praeger Publisher.
Hambleton, R. K. & (2001). Setting performance standards on educational assessments and criteria for evaluating the process, in setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives, Gregory J. Cizek ed., New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated, Pub. Mahwah.
Heri Retnawati. (2008). Penentuan batas lulus (Standard Setting) ujian nasional mata pelajaran matematika di DIY. Laporan Penelitian: PKPSP LP UNY.
Livingston, S. A., & Zieky, M. J. (1982). Passing score: a manual for setting standards of performance on educational and occupational test. US: Educational Testing Service.
Mehrens, W. A., & Cizek, G. J. (2001). Standard setting and the public good: benefit accrued and anticipated, in setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives, Gregory J. Cizek ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated, Pub. Mahwah.
Zieky, M. J., Perie, M., & Livingstone, S. A. (2008). Cut score: a manual for setting standard of performance on educational and occupational test. ND: Sage Publications.
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 6, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5494);
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomo 49 Tahun 2018 tentang Manajemen Pegawai Pemerintah Dengan Perjanjian Kerja (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2018 Nomor 224, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6264)
All articles in Jurnal Desentralisasi dan Kebijakan Publik (JDKP) can be disseminated provided they include the identity of the article and the source of the article (Jurnal Desentralisasi dan Kebijakan Publik). The publisher is not responsible for the contents of the article. The content of the article is the sole responsibility of the author
Jurnal Desentralisasi dan Kebijakan Publik (JDKP) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.