Strategi Ketahanan Supply Chain Maritime di Perusahaan Freight Forwarding dengan Pendekatan QFD Berbasis Macroergonomi

Evi Yuliawati; Silvana Mohamad; Ahmad Fasih

doi:10.30656/intech.v11i1.7895

Authors

Evi Yuliawati Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4821-3203
Silvana Mohamad Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Ahmad Fasih Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30656/intech.v11i1.7895

Keywords:

Freight Forwarding, Maritime Risk, MAS, QFD, Supply Chain Resilience

Abstract

The increasing demand for maritime logistics services requires freight forwarding companies to initiate new ways to operate more efficiently. Business challenges will continue to grow, so companies must balance the quality of logistics services desired by consumers with maritime risks that could disrupt the company's operational performance. This study analyzes the resilience of a freight forwarding company's maritime supply chain. A three-phase Quality Function Deployment (QFD) approach was implemented to develop maritime risk mitigation strategies. The Macroergonomic Analysis of Structure (MAS) perspective involves three elements of the socio-technical system: the technology subsystem, personnel, and external environment. A more optimal work system structure design is hoped to be produced. Integrating the QFD approach based on the MAS perspective resulted in designing maritime supply chain resilience strategies across three subsystem categories. Some of the strategies obtained for each subsystem are as follows: the strategy for the technology subsystem is to implement IT security measures against the potential risk of hacker attacks. The strategy for the personnel subsystem for the top three potential risks is to schedule maintenance for irregular crane maintenance, conduct training for the potential risk of unskilled warehouse operators, and schedule maintenance for the potential risk of irregular truck maintenance. The strategies for the external environment subsystem for the top three potential risks are: designating a maintenance point of contact (PIC) and spare parts for potential crane machine damage, conducting proper maintenance for potential truck machine damage, and obtaining insurance for potential unpredictable road accidents.

Downloads

References

Baihaqie, M. I., Andesta, D., & Priyana, E. D. (2022). Identifikasi dan Evaluasi Risiko Operasional Logistik dengan Metode Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (Studi Kasus : PT. ABC Gresik). Jurnal Serambi Engineering, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.32672/jse.v7i4.4631

Bottani, E., & Rizzi, A. (2006). Strategic management of logistics service: A fuzzy QFD approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 585–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.11.006

Chang, C.-H., Xu, J., & Song, D.-P. (2014). An analysis of safety and security risks in container shipping operations: A case study of Taiwan. Safety Science, 63, 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.008

Cohen, L. (1995). How to Make QFD Work for You. Productsy Press. https://archive.org/details/qualityfunctiond0000cohe

Drewry. (2009). Risk Management in International Transport and Logistics. Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd, London. https://www.drewry.co.uk/

Gölgeci, I., & Ponomarov, S. Y. (2015). How does firm innovativeness enable supply chain resilience? The moderating role of supply uncertainty and interdependence. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(3), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2014.971003

Gurning, S., & Cahoon, S. (2011). Analysis of multi-mitigation scenarios on maritime disruptions. Maritime Policy & Management, 38(3), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2011.572701

Huang, S., Bulut, E., Duru, O., C.N.Y, H., & Yoshida, S. (2015). Service quality assesment in liner shipping industry: an empirical study on Asian shipping case. International Journal of Shipping Transport Logistics, 7(2), 221–242. https://trid.trb.org/view/1346097

Iriastadi, H., & Yassirli. (2014). Ergonomi Suatu Pengantar. Rosda Jaya Putra. https://www.rosda.id/pengantar-ergonomi/

Isti’anah, P. R., Praharsi, Y., Maharani, A., & Wee, H. M. (2021). Supply chain resilience analysis using the quality function deployment (QFD) approach in a freight forwarding company. Reliability: Theory and Applications, 16(2), 15–26. https://www.gnedenko.net/Journal/2021/SI_022021/RTA_SI_2_2021-02_015-026.pdf

Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Kemaritiman dan Investasi. (2023). KTT AIS 2023 Upaya Indonesia Menjadi Negara Maritim Kuat. Dinas Kominfotik Provinsi Lampung. https://ppid.lampungprov.go.id/detail-post/KTT-AIS-2023-Upaya-Indonesia-Menjadi-Negara-Maritim-Kuat

Lam, J. S. ., & Zhang, L. (2014). Enhanced logistics service provider framework for higher integration and efficiency in maritime logistics. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl, 17(2), 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2013.836161

Lam, J. S. L., & Bai, X. (2016). A quality function deployment approach to improve maritime supply chain resilience. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 92, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.01.012

Latifah, L., & Larasati, D. (2018). Tantangan Internal dalam Mewujudkan Indonesia Sebagai Poros Maritim Dunia. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 10(2), 204. https://doi.org/10.20473/jhi.v10i2.7307

Lu, C. (2003). The impact of carrier service attributes on shipper-carrier partnering relationships: a shippers perspective. Transport. Res. E : Logist. Transport. Rev., 39(5), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-5545(03)00015-2

M. Z. U, A. (2015). Analysis of Customer Perception on the Core Service Quality of Freight Forwarding Business of Kuehne + Nagel Ltd.: Empirical Evidence from Bangladesh. International Journal of Trade & Commerce-IIARTC, 4(1), 218–232. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2839511

Mohamad, S., & Yuliawati, E. (2023). Mitigasi Risiko Supply Chain Rumput Laut Berdasarkan Perspektif Macroergonomics Analysis Of Structure. Tekinfo, 11(2), 113–120. http://ejurnal.setiabudi.ac.id/ojs/index.php/tekinfo/article/view/1627

Mulyadi, A. P., & Abdullah, N. M. (2022). Analisis Penyebab Keterlambatan Bongkar Muat Barang Akibat Faktor Peralatan Kapal Pelni Cabang Surabaya (Studi Kasus: KM Sinabung). https://repository.uisi.ac.id/

Notteboom, T. (2006). The time factor in liner shipping services. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 8, 19–39. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5223613_The_Time_Factor_in_Liner_Shipping_Services

Okthary, S. (2019). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Pelabuhan Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan Bongkar Muat Pada PT. Pelabuhan Indonesia I (Persero) Cabang Belawan. Skripsi. Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara. http://repository.uinsu.ac.id/7705/

Piri, N. I., Sutrisno, A., & Mende, J. (2016). Penerapan Metode Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Untuk Menangani Non Value Added Activity Pada Proses Perawatan Mesin. Teknik Mesin, 6(1). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/poros/article/view/14853

Pradini, A. H., Lucitasari, D. R., & Putro, G. M. (2019). Perbaikan Sistem Kerja Dengan Pendekatan Macroergonomic Analysis And Design (Mead) Untuk Meningkatkan Produktifitas Pekerja (Studi kasus di UD Majid Jaya, Sarang, Rembang, Jawa Tengah). OPSI, 12(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.31315/opsi.v12i1.2897

Saraswati, A., Baihaqi, I., & Anggrahini, D. (2017). Membangun Supply Chain Resilience dengan Pendekatan Quality Function Development: Studi Kasus Perusahaan Freight Forwarder. Jurnal Sains Dan Seni ITS, 6(2), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.12962/j23373520.v6i2.25939

Stevenson, M., & Spring, M. (2007). Flexibility from a supply chain perspective: definition and review. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(7), 685–713. https://doi.org/10.1108/0144357071075695

The Insurance Institute of India. (2018). Insurance requIrements of the IndIan LogIstIcs and WarehousIng Industry and theIr customers. Transport Corporation of India Ltd. https://www.insuranceinstituteofindia.com/documents/6454111/6454386/TCIL+Report+pdf.pdf

Vilko, J. P. P., & Hallikas, J. M. (2012). Risk assessment in multimodal supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(2), 586–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.09.010

Wati, A. W. (2018). Peranan Freight Forwarder Dalam Menunjang Aktivitas Ekspor Antar Negara Melalui Jalur Laut Dan Udara. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya, 7(1), 2909–2928. http://journal.ubaya.ac.id/index.php/jimus/article/view/2443

Wen, C.-H., & Lin, W.-W. (2015). Customer Segmentation of Freight Forwarders and Impacts on the Competitive Positioning of Ocean Carriers in the Taiwan–Southern China Trade Lane. Maritime Policy & Management, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2015.1111527

Wen, C.-H., & Lin, W.-W. (2016). Customer segmentation of freight forwarders and impacts on the competitive positioning of ocean carriers in the Taiwan–southern China trade lane. Maritime Policy & Management, 43(4), 420–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2015.1111527