Implementasi Metode Fuzzy Topsis pada Pemilihan Pemasok Bahan Baku SS400
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30656/intech.v9i2.6468Keywords:
Bahan Baku, Multi Criteria Fuzzy Topsis, Pemilihan Pemasok, SS400Abstract
Pemilihan pemasok mempunyai peranan penting untuk mendapatkan produk dan rantai pasok yang baik. Supplier yang dimiliki perusahaan belum mampu memenuhi semua kriteria yang telah ditetapkan pihak perusahaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan memilih pemasok yang tepat bahan baku SS400 dengan pendekatan metode Fuzzy TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution). Empat (4) Kriteria pemasok yaitu: Kualitas, Harga, pengiriman dan pelayanan digunakan dengan parameter kriteria memiliki variabel linguistic fuzzy berpengaruh terhadap keuntungan dan biaya pemasok. Empat belas (14) pemasok bekerja sama untuk memasok bahan baku SS400 sesuai dengan kriteria yang ditetapkan perusahaan. Nominasi matrik penilaian berpasangan ditentukan oleh para pakar bidang industri dan akademisi dengan penilaian subjektif memberikan penilaian terhadap kriteria-kriteria yang berkaitan dengan alternatif pemasok yang akurat dan solusi handal untuk pengambilan keputusan yang divalidasi melalui studi kasus pada industri secara nyata. Fungsi keanggotaan bilangan fuzzy dimasukkan dengan tujuan untuk merepresentasikan derajat kedekatan suatu objek terhadap atribut alternatif penentuan pemasok terbaik. Hasil pemilihan pemasok diperoleh pemasok terbaik yang direkomendasikan adalah PT. AAS dengan nilai preferensi 3,49408.
Downloads
References
Arini, D. (2017). Analisis Pemilihan Vendor Dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Metode Fuzzy Topsis di PT. Tripatra Engineers And Constructors. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, 3(1), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.24912/jitiuntar.v3i1.510
Cakar, T., & Çavuş, B. (2021). Supplier selection process in dairy industry using fuzzy topsis method. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 4(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta2040182c
Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2016). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation. Editorial Prentice Hall New Jersey. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=m1XFoQEACAAJ&dq
Hamidah, M., Mohd Hasmadi, I., Chua, L. S. L., Yong, W. S. Y., Lau, K. H., Faridah-Hanum, I., & Pakhriazad, H. Z. (2022). Development of a protocol for Malaysian Important Plant Areas criterion weights using Multi-criteria Decision Making - Analytical Hierarchy Process (MCDM-AHP). Global Ecology and Conservation, 34(December 2021), e02033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02033
Hwang, Y. dan. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Evaluasi Kinerja Dosen dengan Metode Technique for Order By Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) & Preference Ranking Organization for Evaluation (PROMETHEE). Jurnal Cendika, 16(1), 35–42. https://www.jurnal.dcc.ac.id/index.php/JC/article/view/62
Kadir, M. F., & Sopyan, I. (2020). Kualifikasi Pemasok Bahan Baku yang Digunakan pada Industri Farmasi. Majalah Farmasetika, 5(2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.24198/mfarmasetika.v5i2.26237
Krisnaningsih, E., Arkeman, Y., Hambali, E., & Marimin. (2022). Decision Model for Determining the Feasibility of Rice-Based Bioenergy Supply Chain Development Area with Fuzzy Logic-AHP Approach. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1034(1), 012007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1034/1/012007
Krisnaningsih, E., Brillian, A., & Dwiyatno, S. (2022). Analisa Multi-Criteria Pemilihan Pemasok Baja Slab. In Jurnal InTent (Vol. 5, Issue 1). http://ejournal.lppm-unbaja.ac.id/index.php/intent/article/view/2096
Krisnaningsih, E., Sakti, I. R., Dwiyatno, S., & Ridwan, A. (2022). A fuzzy FMEA for detecting the risk of defects in polyethylene (PE) film products. Journal Industrial Servicess, 8(2), 204–210. https://doi.org/10.36055/jiss.v8i2.16592
Krisnaningsih, E., Sulistyo, A. B., Rahim, A., & Dwiyatno, S. (2022). Fuzzy risk priority number assessment to detect midsole product defects. Jurnal Sistem Dan Manajemen Industr, 6(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.30656/jsmi.v6i1.4013
Lestari, S., & Priyodiprodjo, W. (2011). Implementasi Metode Fuzzy TOPSIS untuk Seleksi Penerimaan Karyawan. IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems), 5(2), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijccs.2014
Liu, P., Zhu, B., Wang, P., & Shen, M. (2020). An approach based on linguistic spherical fuzzy sets for public evaluation of shared bicycles in China. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 87(September 2019), 103295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103295
Mathangi, S., & Prakash Maran, J. (2021). Sensory evaluation of apple ber using fuzzy TOPSIS. Materials Today: Proceedings, 45, 2982–2986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.962
Memari, A., Dargi, A., Akbari Jokar, M. R., Ahmad, R., & Abdul Rahim, A. R. (2019). Sustainable supplier selection: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 50 (November 2018), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.11.002
Mokhtarian, M. N. (2015). A note on ‘Extension of fuzzy TOPSIS method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets’. Applied Soft Computing, 26, 513–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.10.013
Nădăban, S., Dzitac, S., & Dzitac, I. (2016). Fuzzy TOPSIS: A General View. Procedia Computer Science, 91(Itqm), 823–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.088
Namin, F. S., Ghadi, A., & Saki, F. (2022). A literature review of Multi Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) towards mining method selection (MMS). Resources Policy, 77(November 2021), 102676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102676
Onu, P. U., Quan, X., Xu, L., Orji, J., & Onu, E. (2017). Evaluation of sustainable acid rain control options utilizing a fuzzy TOPSIS multi-criteria decision analysis model frame work. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 612–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.065
Pujotomo, D., Umaindra, M. A., & Wicaksono, P. A. (2018). Perancangan Model Pemilihan Supplier Produk Cetakan Dengan Menggunakan Grey Based Topsis (Studi Kasus: Rumah Sakit Islam Sultan Agung Semarang). J@ti Undip : Jurnal Teknik Industri, 13(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.14710/jati.13.2.99-108
Rofiah, S. (2016). Seleksi Penerimaan Calon Manajer Menggunakan Fuzzy-TOPSIS pada PT. Samafitro. Information Management for Educators and Professionals, 1(1), 86–95. http://ejournal-binainsani.ac.id/index.php/IMBI/article/view/221
Saelan, A. (2009). Logika Fuzzy. In Makalah If2091 Struktur Diskrit Tahun 2009 (Vol. 1). https://informatika.stei.itb.ac.id/~rinaldi.munir/Matdis/2009-2010/Makalah0910/MakalahStrukdis0910-107.pdf
Safa, M., Shahi, A., Haas, C. T., & Hipel, K. W. (2014). Supplier selection process in an integrated construction materials management model. Automation in Construction, 48, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.08.008
Salih, M. M., Zaidan, B. B., Zaidan, A. A., & Ahmed, M. A. (2019). Survey on fuzzy TOPSIS state-of-the-art between 2007 and 2017. Computers & Operations Research, 104, 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2018.12.019
Schramm, V. B., Cabral, L. P. B., & Schramm, F. (2020). Approaches for supporting sustainable supplier selection - A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 123089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123089
Suci, A. T., Asyari, H., Prasetiawan, A. Y., & Pratomo, N. A. (2020). Metode Fuzzy TOPSIS Pada Pengambilan Keputusan Rekrutmen Karyawan PT. Erporate Solusi Global. Teknoin, 26(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.20885/teknoin.vol26.iss1.art2
Tavana, M., Shaabani, A., Di Caprio, D., & Bonyani, A. (2021). An integrated group fuzzy best-worst method and combined compromise solution with Bonferroni functions for supplier selection in reverse supply chains. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 2(July), 100009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2021.100009
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
