Usulan Perbaikan Kualitas Produk Pipa Api 5L PSL2 Menggunakan Metode Six Sigma

  • Ahmad Nalhadi Universitas Serang Raya
  • Nur Aida Universitas Serang Raya
  • Gina Ramayanti Universitas Serang Raya
https://doi.org/10.30656/intech.v4i2.1083
Abstract views: 310 , PDF downloads: 267
Keywords: Defect, DPMO, Six Sigma

Abstract

The production process of API 5L PSL2 pipes in Pipe Companies in 2017 happened to defect products at 7%. This defect is still above the standards set by the Company at 4%. The study aims to determine the value of sigma and provide recommendations for improvement with the six sigma method. Based on the results of the DMAI analysis, the amount of the pipe sigma level was 3.65 with the value of DPMO 14448. Types of defects identified in the process such as open welding defects, high lows, contact marking, scarring, and under dimension Proposed improvements were made by designing recommendations for improvements using 5W + 1H by checking the condition of the forming machine and changing bearing components before the bearing lifetime, performing preventive maintenance every week and adding coolant bursts to the cutting tool.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hendradi, T. C. (2012). Statistik six sigma dengan Minitab, Panduan Cerdas Inisiatif Kualitas. Yogyakarta: CV. Andi Offset.

Kusumawati, A., & Fitriyeni, L. (2017). Pengendalian Kualitas Proses Pengemasan Gula Dengan Pendekatan Six Sigma. Jurnal Sistem Dan Manajemen Industri, 1(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.30656/jsmi.v1i1.173

Kwak, Y. H., & Anbari, F. T. (2006). Benefits, obstacles, and future of six sigma approach. Technovation, 26(5–6), 708–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.10.003

Nelfiyanti, N., Rani, A. M., & Fauzi, A. (2018). Implementasi Six Sigma untuk Perbaikan Kualitas Produk Kiwi Paste Berdasarkan Keluhan Pelanggan. Jurnal Sistem Dan Manajemen Industri, 2(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.30656/jsmi.v2i1.609

Schroeder, R. G., Linderman, K., Liedtke, C., & Choo, A. S. (2008). Six Sigma: Definition and underlying theory. Journal of Operations Management, 26(4), 536–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.06.007

Supriyadi, S., Ramayanti, G., & Aditia, Y. (2017). Analisa Kualitas Precious Slag Ball dengan Pendekatan Six Sigma. In Proceedings Seminar Ilmiah Nasional (pp. 45–58). Universitas Pamulang.

Supriyadi, S., Ramayanti, G., & Roberto, A. C. (2017, December). Analisis Kualitas Produk dengan Pendekatan Six Sigma. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Riset Terapan| SENASSET (pp. 7-13).

Wulandari, E. P., Lubis, M. Y., & Yanuar, A. A. (2018). Usulan Perbaikan Untuk Meminimasi Defect Short Mold Pada Proses Peleburan Produk Grip Panjang Di Cv. Gradient Dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Six Sigma. EProceedings of Engineering, 5(2), 481–488.

Zare Mehrjerdi, Y. (2011). Six-Sigma: methodology, tools and its future. Assembly Automation, 31(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.01.003

PlumX Metrics

Published
2018-12-30
How to Cite
Nalhadi, A., Aida, N., & Ramayanti, G. (2018). Usulan Perbaikan Kualitas Produk Pipa Api 5L PSL2 Menggunakan Metode Six Sigma. Jurnal INTECH Teknik Industri Universitas Serang Raya, 4(2), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.30656/intech.v4i2.1083
Issue
Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018)
Section
Articles