KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN TES DNA DALAM PENETAPAN ANAK KANDUNG MENURUT HUKUM ACARA PERDATA

Muhamad Rizki Firdaus; Nuryati Solapari; Efriyanto

doi:10.30656/ajudikasi.v10i1.12372

Authors

Muhamad Rizki Firdaus Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Nuryati Solapari Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Efriyanto Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v10i1.12372

Keywords:

dna testing, civil evidence, determination of biological child

Abstract

The legal status of a child is a key element of civil law, shaping legal identity, family relationships, and related civil rights. Advances in science have made DNA testing a highly accurate tool for establishing biological parentage. However, Indonesian civil procedural law does not explicitly recognize DNA test results as independent evidence, creating uncertainty about their legal status, probative value, and judicial use in parentage cases. This study reviews the legal status and evidentiary value of DNA test results under Indonesian law and examines judicial reasoning in Tangerang District Court Determination Number 423/Pdt.P/2025/PN Tng. The research uses normative legal methods, including statutory and case analysis, and applies qualitative descriptive analysis to primary and secondary legal materials. The findings show that DNA test results are considered expert opinion within documentary evidence under Article 154 of the Herziene Indonesisch Reglement (HIR), not as a separate evidence category. Their probative value depends on the judge's evaluation of all evidence presented. Therefore, clearer regulations on the legal status, use, and evidentiary value of DNA test results are needed to improve legal certainty, judicial consistency, and the protection of children's civil rights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Book:

Ali, Achmad, and Wiwie Heryani. ASAS-ASAS HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN PERDATA. 1st ed. Jakarta: PRENAMEDIA GROUP, 2012.

Journals:

Alharun, Syadid Jiddan, A, Tiara Ramadhanib, Aldi Prasetiawan Saputrac, Aulia Rexana Sitaresmid, Ria, and Anggraeni Utamie. “Telaah Normatif Kedudukan Dan Kekuatan Pembuktian Tes Deoxyribonucleic Acid Sebagai Alat Bukti Sah Dalam Sistem Pembuktian Hukum Pidana Nasional.” Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik 3, no. 1 (2025): 343–51

Diani, Ayu Aftika. “Tes Deoxyribo Nucleic Acid ( DNA ) Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Membuktikan Anak Luar Kawin.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum 5 (2025): 34–41.

Ginting, Juliati Br. “PROSES PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PERDATA.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum “THE JURIS” IV, no. I (2020): 12–21.

Hasibuan Zahraini Nur. “Perlindungan Hukum Anak Luar Kawin Yang Diakui Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata.” JURNAL NOTARIUS 2, no. 2 (2023): 421–31.

Imadhani, Intan, and Budi Santoso. “Keabsahan Hukum Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Pada Proses Jual Beli Di Bawah Tangan.” NOTARIUS 17 (2024): 1937–53.

Juanda, Enju. “Kekuatan Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Perdata Menurut Hukum Positif Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi 4, no. 1 (2016): 27–30.

Marzuki, Gilang Achmad, and Agung Setyawan. “Peran Orang Tua Dalam Pendidikan Anak.” Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Budaya 1, no. 1 (2022).

Matondang, Zulkifli. “Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Suatu Instrumen Penelitian.” JURNAL TABULARASA PPS UNIMED 6, no. 1 (2009): 87–97.

Mentari, Chai Chelsea Septiani, Fani Putri Thalia, Muhammad Nabil Alhafiz, and Sri Handayani. “Pembuktian Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata: Konsep, Pengaturan, Beban Pembuktian, Dan Alat-Alat Bukti.” Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal 3, no. 3 (2026): 1100–1111.

Nazar, Taufid Hidayat, and Nita Rismawati. “HAK KEPERDATAAN BAGI ANAK DILUAR KAWIN DALAM SISTEM HUKUM DI INDONESIA.” Syakhsiyah Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 2, no. 1 (2022): 61–72.

Neltje, Jeane, and Indrawieny Panjiyoga. “Nilai-Nilai Yang Tercakup Di Dalam Asas Kepastian Hukum.” Journal Of Social Science Research 3 (2023): 2034–39.

Permana, Afrisyal Chandra, and Hosnah. “Perlindungan Anak Sebagai Subjek Hukum : Tinjauan Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Negara Dalam Perfektif Ham.” Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 2025, 9935–46.

Risqy, Moch. Fahruz. “IMPLIKASI YURIDIS PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 46/PUU-VIII/2010 TERKAIT PERLINDUNGAN HAK ANAK.” Yuridika 30 (2015).

Saepullah, Asep. “Peranan Alat Bukti Dalam Hukum Acara Peradilan.” Mahkamah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 3, no. 1 (2018): 141–57.

Sari, Ni Putu Riyani Kartika, and Ni Luh Putu Geney Sri Kusuma Dewi. “EKSISTENSI TEORI PEMBUKTIAN POSITIEF WETTELIJK BEWIJSTHEORIE DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PERDATA” 12, no. 2085 (2020): 132–40.

Utami, Iftitah. “Eksistensi Tes Deoxyribo Nucleic Acid Dalam Menentukan Nasab.” Medina-Te, Jurnal Studi Islam 14 (2016): 143–60.

Yudiant, Ahmad, Arofi Kurniawan, Fery Setiawan, Abdul Hadi Furqoni, and Beta Novia Rizky. “Paternity Test Through Kinship Analysis and Cell Free Fetal DNA (Cff-DNA) as a Forensic Identification Technique.” Journal of International Dental and Medical Research, no. 47 (2022).

Zahra, Khansa Laily Az, Moh Fadwa Mufid Al Amjad, Syafa Nabya Maulidian, Septiani Silvia, and Fadilla Azfa Asyifa. “RELEVANSI KEPENTINGAN ALAT-ALAT BUKTI DALAM PROSES PENYELESAIAN HUKUM PERDATA.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum “THE JURIS” VIII, no. 1 (2024): 95–104.

Regulations:

“Herziene Indonesisch Reglement (HIR),” n.d.

“Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata,” n.d

“Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 Tentang Perlindungan Anak,” 2014.

“Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan,” 2019.

Decision Court:

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. “Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia,” n.d.

———. Putusan No. 1055 K/Pdt (2023).

Indonesia, Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 (2010).

Pengadilan Negeri Tangerang. “Putusan Nomor 423/Pdt.P/2025/PN Tng,” 2025.

Scientific Report:

Genetic Technologies Johar. “DNA Paternity Testing Procedure Report,” 2025

Website/Internet:

Tumpa, Harifin A. “Sambutan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Pada Acara Seminar Sehari ``Problem Hukum Keluarga Antara Realita Dan Kepastian Hukum’’.” Ikatan Hakim Indonesia (IKAHI), September 2009.