Pengaruh Soft Control Dan hard Control Terhadap Hasil Temuan Auditor Internal Di Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum Se Provinsi Banten
Abstract views: 431
,
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloads: 3211
Abstract
This research aims to test the impact of integrity and ethical values, commitment to competence, Tone at the Top, work culture, organizational structure, Sop and supervision of the findings of the Internal Auditor Regional Water Company (PDAM) in the province of Banten. The samples in this study using purposive sampling method. Data were collected using a questionnaire survey techniques. The target respondents of this study were 100 respondents, but the data is data that can be processed is 83 respondents. To test the quality of the data from the instrument used to do with the validity and test ralibilitas. Test the classical assumption of normality test, multicollinearity, homogeneity test and test heterkodastisitas is intended as a requirement to perform multiple linear regression test.
The results of multiple regression analysis showed that the variation of the variable findings of the internal auditor can be explained by the variable of integrity and ethical values, commitment to competence, tone at the top, work culture, organizational structure, soup and supervision 52.9 percent, t test showed that the variables Integrity and ethical values, commitment to competence, Sop and Supervision affect the findings of the internal auditor, while variable Tone at the Top, Culture Work and Organizational Structure there are no influence against the findings of the internal auditor.
The results of research shows that Integrity and Ethics Values, Commitment Competence, SOP and Oversight had a positive influence on the Findings of the Internal Auditor. The test results provide a synthesis hypothesis that the better Integrita and ValuesEthics, Commitment Competence, SOP, and the stronger the less oversight findings of internal auditors found (fewers error)
Downloads
References
Abernethy, M.A., Bouwens, J., dan Van Lent, L. 2010. Leadership and Control System Design. Management Accounting Research, Vol 21:2-16
Akmal. 2006. Pemeriksaan Intern (Internal Audit).Jakarta: PT Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.
Alim dkk. 2007. Pengaruh Kompetensi Dan Independensi Terhadap Kualitas Audit Dengan Etika Auditor Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. SNA X.
Makasar.
Amin Widjaja, Tunggal. 2002. Internal Auditting (suatu pengantar). Jakarta: Harvarindo
Amirullah Haris Budiono. 2004. Pengantar Manajemen, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta,
Anthony and Govindjaran. 2003. Management Control System. Eleventh Edition. Mc Graw Hill International Edition.
Arens, Alvin A.,Randal J. Elder & Mark S. Beasley. 2010. Auditing&AssuranceServices An IntegratedApproach. 13thEditionPrenticeEducation International.
Arieswibowo, Darmadi, 2009. Control Self-Assesment atas Sistem Penegndalian Intern Mekanisme Pencairan Dana pada Bendahara Umum Daerah Pemerintan Porvinsi Gorontalo, tesis Magister Ekonomi Pembangunan, UGM, Yogyakarta
Arifiyadi,T. 2008, konsep tentang akuntabilitas dan implementasinya di Indonesia, artikel di Inspektorat Jendral kemnetrian komunikasi dan informatika
Asih. Dwi Ananing Tyas, 2006. Jurnal. Pengaruh Pengalamam Terhadap Peningkatan Keahlian auditor dalam Bidang Auditing. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Islam Indonesia. Yogyakarta
Bambers, E.M. L.S. Byilinski, J.H. (1982). The Audit Team and the Audit Process: AnOrganizationalApproach”. JournalofAccountingLiterature. Spring 35-38.
Boynton, William C., et.al. 2002. ModernAuditing, 7th Edition. John Willey Sons Inc: New York.
Burns, T & G Stalker. 1961. The Management of Innovations. Tavistockpublication: London
Chang, C-C., Devaney, S.A & Chiremba, S.T. 2004. Determinant of Subjective and ObjektiveriskTolerance. Journal of Personal finance, 3(3), 53-57
Commite of Sponsoring Organization of the Treadway, Commision of Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013:3);
Donnely, David P., Jeffrey J.Q, and David O. 2003. AuditorAcceptanceofDysfunctionalAuditBehavior: An Explanatory Model Using Auditors’ Personal Characteristics.” Journal of Behavioral Research In Accounting: vol15:87-107.
Efferin, Sujoko dan Soeherman, M.S. 2012. Managemen control’s and Leadership Style in Family Business. Papper Presented at the 3rdGAOC Confrence. 14-17 Juli 2012, Sunway Universitas Malasyia
Halsey, 2003, http://www.google.com/pengawasan organisasi, html. Diakses tahun 2016
.
Hani.T. Handoko. Manajemen, BPPE. Ygyakarta
Hendyat Soetopo, 2001. Manajemen Pendidikan (Bahan Kuliah Manajemen Pendidikan). Universitas Negeri Malang: Malang.
Hiro Tugiman.1997. Standar Profesional Audit Internal. Kanisius: Yogyakarta
Husein Umar, 2007, “Metode Penelitian Untuk Skripsi dan Tesis Bisnis”, Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada
Imbar R.V. 2005. Jurnal Informatika UKM, Volume I: 11-19.
Jensen, M & Meckling.W. 1976.Theory Of firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure journal of financial economics vol.3 no.4 p 305-306
Kimura, S., dan Mourdoukoutas, P. 2000. Effective Integration of management control System for competing in global industries. Europan business review, Vol 12(1): 41-45
Klauss, R., dan B.M, Bass.1982. interner personal comunicationin organization: Academic Press New York, NY
Kohlberg, L. (1995). Tahap-tahap Perkembangan Moral, diterjemahkan oleh John de Santo dan AgusCremers, Yogyakarta: Kanisius
Koontz, H., & Cyrill O’Donnell. Management, Erlangga. Jakarta
Liu, Jin & Bin Lin. (2012). Government Auditing and Corruption Control: Evidence from China’s provincial panel data.China Journal of Accounting Research, 5, 163-186
Mabruri dan Jaka Winarna, 2010. Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kualitas Hasil Audit Simposium Nasional AKuntansi XII
Media Pertamina 2008, Mencari Solusi untuk Keberlanjutran Energi Nasional
Magnis-Suseno, F. (2000). 12 Tokoh Etika Abad Ke-20, Yogyakarta: Kanisiu
M. Manullang, Dasar-Dasar Manajemen, Jakarta, Galia Indonesia, 1990
Muller, R., dan Turner. J.R. 2006. Matching the project manager’s leadership style to project type. International Journal of Prjoject Management. Vol 25:21-32
Mulyadi. 2002. Auditing, Edisi keenam, Cetakan Pertama, Jakarta: Salemba Empat
Peikoff, L. (1991). Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand, New York: Meridian.
Pusdiklatwas BPKP. 2005. Kode Etik dan Standar Audit, Pusat Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Pengawasan Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan
Rahmadi Marwanto, Adi Budiarso, Fajar Hasri Ramadhan. 2011. Audit Sektor Publik, Suatu Pengantar Bagi Pembangunan Akuntabilitas Instansi Pemerintah. Jakarta: Lembaga Pengkajian Keuangan Publik dan Akuntansi Pemerintah Badan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Keuangan Departemen Keuangan R.I
Rahmawati, J.D.W. 2013. Pengaruh Kompetensi dan Independensi terhadap Kualitas Audit
Rand, A. (1964). The Virtue of Selfishness: A New Concept of Egoism, New York: New AmericanLibrary
Rest, J. (1986). Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory, New York: Prager
Riantiarno, Azlina 2011, faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah (studi pada satuan kerja Perangkat daerah kabupaten Rokan hulu)
Riley, W.B., & Chow, K.V. 1992. Asset Allocation and Individuals Risk Aversion. Financial Analysis journal, 48 (6), 32-37
Robert N Anthony, Vijay Govindjaran, 2003, Management Control System: Salemba Empat
Robbins, Stephen. P. dan Mary Coulter. 2005. Manajemen. PT Indeks Kelompok Gramedia: Jakarta.
Roux, Aurélie Kessous, 2008. A Semiotic analysis of nostalgia as a to the past. Qualitative Market Research: An International JournalVolume 11, Issue 2
Saleh, Rahmat. 2004. Studi Empiris Ketepatan Waktu Pelaporan Keuangan Perusahaan Manufaktur di BEJ. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi III Denpasar
Sawyer, Lawrence B et al 2002. Sawyer’s Internal Auditing. The Practice of Modern Internal Auditing 5th Edition, Florida. The Institute Of Internal Auditors
Setiawan, Wawan, 2006. Analisa Pengaruh Mekanisme Corporate Governance Terhadap Kualitas Laba
Siswanto.H.B. 2011, Pengantar Manajemen, Bumi Aksara. Jakarta
Sriwidodo, Untung dan Agus Budhi Haryanto. 2010. Pengaruh Kompetensi,
Motivasi, Komunikasi Dan Kesejahteraan Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai
Dinas Pendidikan. Jurnal Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, 4(1): h:47-57
Sukrisno Agoes, 2004. Auditing (Pemeriksaan Akuntansi) oleh kantor Akuntan Publik. Jakarta. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia
Sunarto. 2003. Penyelenggaraan Otonomi Daerah dilihat dari Presfektif Ketahanan Nasional. Institut Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Semarang Diakses Tanggal 01 Desember 2015
Sutrisno Hadi. 2004. Analisa Regresi. Yogyakarta: Andi Ofset
Trevino, L. K. (1992). “Moral Reasoning and Business Ethics: Implications for Research, Education, andManagement”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 11, pp 445 – 59.
Wati, E. Lisnawati dan N. Aprilia. 2010. Pengaruh Independensi, Gaya Kepemimpinan, Komitmen Organisasi dan Pemahaman GoodGovernance terhadap Kinerja Auditor Pemerintah. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XII Purwekerto
Wibowo. 2012. Manajemen Kinerja Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta : PT. RajaGrafindo
Persada.
Copyright (c) 2019 Mohamad Husni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author(s) retain the copyright of articles published in this journal, with first publication rights granted to JAK (Jurnal Akuntansi) : Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi This Work by JAK (Jurnal Akuntansi) : Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
