Pandemic Covid-19 And Audit Quality Of Public Accountant Firm In East Jakarta

Authors

  • Budiandru Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof Dr HAMKA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30656/jak.v9i1.3208

Abstract

The public accounting profession is responsible for increasing the reliability of the company's financial statements so that the public can obtain reliable financial information as a basis for decision making. This study analyzes independence and competence in audit quality with audit risk as a moderating variable. Pandemic affects most of the business processes carried out by public accounting firms, be it internal management, to reconsider audit engagements to alternative audit approaches that must be taken in a pandemic. Respondents in this study are auditors who work at the Public Accounting Firm in East Jakarta. The number of auditors who were the sample of this study was 250 respondents consisting of auditors from the public accounting firm. The method used in this research is multiple linear regression analysis. The results showed that competence had a significant effect on audit quality. Auditors need to increase additional knowledge by participating in training and professional courses so that their competencies are increasingly developing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdillah, M. R., Mardijuwono, A. W., & Habiburrochman, H. (2019). The Effect of Company Characteristics and Auditor Characteristics to Audit Report Lag. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 4(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajar-05-2019-0042

Aburous, D. (2019). IFRS and Institutional Work in the Accounting Domain. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 62, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.10.001

Adekoya, A. C., Oboh, C. S., & Oyewumi, O. R. (2020). Accountant's Perception of the Factors Influencing Auditors' ethical Behaviour in Nigeria. Heliyon, 6(6), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04271

Afandi, F., Pagalung, G., & Tawakkal. (2020). The Effect of Professionalism, and Organizational Commitment to the Auditor Intention to do Whistleblowing with Legal Protection as a Moderating Variable Afandi, Gagarin, Tawakkal. Global Scientific Journal, 8(6), 1619–1634.

Aghazadeh, S., & Hoang, K. (2020). How Does audit firm Emphasis on Client Relationship Quality Influence Auditors' Inferences About and Responses to Potential Persuasion in client Communications? Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2020.101175

Aizsila, I., & Ikaunieks, R. (2014). Changes and Challenges Facing the Audit Profession in Latvia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 627–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.253

Ardelean, A. (2013). Auditors' Ethics and its Impact on Public Trust. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 92, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.637

Barrainkua, I., & Espinosa-Pike, M. (2018). The Influence of Auditors’ Professionalism on Ethical Judgement: Differences among Practitioners and Postgraduate Students. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 21(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2017.07.001

Bjørnskov, C. (2016). Economic Freedom and Economic Crises. European Journal of Political Economy, 45, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.08.003

Cannon, N. H., & Bedard, J. C. (2017). Auditing Challenging Fair Value Measurements: Evidence from the Field. The Accounting Review, 92(4), 81–114.

Cao, L., Li, W., & Zhang, L. (2015). Audit Mode Change, Corporate Governance, and Audit Effort. China Journal of Accounting Research, 8(4), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2015.05.002

Darmawan, D., Sinambela, E. A., & Mauliyah, N. I. (2017). the Effect of Competence, Independence, and Workload on Audit Quality. Journal of Academic Research and Sciences, 2(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.30957/jares.v2i2.404

DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A Review of Archival Auditing Research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(3), 275–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002

Donaldson, T., & Walsh, J. P. (2015). Research in Organizational Behavior Toward a theory of Business. Research in Organizational Behavior, 35, 181–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2015.10.002

Du, X., Yin, J., & Hou, F. (2018). Auditor Human Capital and Financial Misstatement: Evidence from China. China Journal of Accounting Research, 11(4), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2018.06.001

George-Silviu, C., & Melinda-Timea, F. (2015). New Audit Reporting Challenges: Auditing the Going Concern Basis of Accounting. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32(15), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01385-4

Goddard, A. (2020). Accountability and Accounting in the NGO Field Comprising the UK and Africa – A Bordieusian Analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2020.102200

Herda, D. N., & Martin, K. A. (2016). The Effects of Auditor Experience and Professional Commitment on Acceptance of Underreporting Time: A Moderated Mediation Analysis. Current Issues in Auditing, 10(2), A14–A27. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-51479

Heyrani, F., Banimahd, B., & Roudposhti, F. R. (2016). Investigation of the Effect of Auditors’ Professionalism Levels on their Judgment to Resolve the Conflict between Auditor and Management. Procedia Economics and Finance, 36(16), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(16)30029-6

Huguet, D., & Gandía, J. L. (2016). Audit and Earnings Management in Spanish SMEs. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(3), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2015.12.001

Jones, C., Temouri, Y., & Cobham, A. (2018). Tax Haven Networks and the Role of the Big 4 Accountancy Firms. Journal of World Business, 53(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.10.004

Kartal, M. T., İbiş, C., & Çatıkkaş, Ö. (2018). Adequacy of Audit Committees: A Study of Deposit Banks in Turkey. Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(2), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2018.01.002

Knechel, W. R. (2013). Do Auditing Standards Matter? Current Issues in Auditing, 7(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-50499

Kyriacou, O. (2016). Accounting for Images of ‘equality’ in Digital Space: Towards an Exploration of The Greek Accounting Professional Institute. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 35, 35–57.

Liu, J., & Lin, B. (2012). Government Auditing and Corruption Control: Evidence from China’s Provincial Panel Data. China Journal of Accounting Research, 5(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2012.01.002

Mohamed, N., & Handley-Schachler, M. (2015). Roots of Responsibilities to Financial Statement Fraud Control. Procedia Economics and Finance, 28, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01080-1

Morris, M. W., Hong, Ying-Yi., Chiu, Chi-Yue., & Liu, Z. (2015). Neurology: Integrating Insights about Social Norms to Understand Cultural Dynamics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.03.001

Muratovski, G. (2015). Paradigm Shift: Report on the New Role of Design in Business and Society. She Ji (Vol. 1). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2015.11.002

Nolder, C. J., & Kadous, K. (2018). Grounding the Professional Skepticism Construct in Mindset and Attitude Theory: A Way Forward. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 67, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.03.010

Paisey, C., & Paisey, N. J. (2020). Protecting the Public Interest? Continuing Professional Development Policies and Role-profession Conflict in Accountancy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 67(68), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.04.002

Palea, V. (2013). IAS/IFRS and Financial Reporting Quality: Lessons from the European Experience. China Journal of Accounting Research, 6(4), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2013.08.003

Rahmina, L. Y., & Agoes, S. (2014). Influence of Auditor Independence, Audit Tenure, and Audit Fee on Audit Quality of Members of Capital Market Accountant Forum in Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.083

Ruhnke, K., & Schmidt, M. (2014). Misstatements in Financial Statements: The Relationship between Inherent and Control Risk Factors and Audit Adjustments. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(4), 247–269.

Sarwoko, I., & Agoes, S. (2014). An Empirical Analysis of Auditor’s Industry Specialization, Auditor’s Independence and Audit Procedures on Audit Quality: Evidence from Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.077

Turetken, O., Jethefer, S., & Ozkan, B. (2019). Internal Audit Effectiveness: Operationalization and Influencing Factors. Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(2), 238–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-08-2018-1980

Wang, C., & Dou, H. (2015). Does the Transformation of Accounting Firms’ Organizational form Improve Audit Quality? Evidence from China. China Journal of Accounting Research, 8(4), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2014.08.005

Wong, P. W. Y. (2018). Are State Ownership and Auditors’ Locality Determinants of Asset Write-downs? Evidence from China. China Journal of Accounting Research, 11(4), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2018.07.002

Xiao, T., Geng, C., & Yuan, C. (2020). How Audit Effort Affects Audit Quality: An Audit Process and Audit Output Perspective. China Journal of Accounting Research, 13(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2020.02.002

Yan, H., & Xie, S. (2016). How Does Auditors’ Work Stress Affect Audit Quality? Empirical Evidence from the Chinese Stock Market. China Journal of Accounting Research, 9(4), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2016.09.001

Zager, L., Malis, S. S., & Novak, A. (2016). The Role and Responsibility of Auditors in Prevention and Detection of Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, 693–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(16)30291-x

Zhu, L., & Zheng, Q. (2020). The Impact of the Social Security Fund on Auditor Litigation Risk. China Journal of Accounting Research, 13(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2020.05.002

Downloads

Published

2022-01-12

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2022)

Section

Articles

License

Author(s) retain the copyright of articles published in this journal, with first publication rights granted to JAK (Jurnal Akuntansi) : Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi This Work by JAK (Jurnal Akuntansi) : Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.  This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited