Pengaruh Desentralisasi Dan Ketidakpastian Tugas Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Dengan Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen Sebagai Variabel Intervening
Empirical Study on Large-Scale Printing Industry in Banten Province
Abstract views: 949
,
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloads: 1199
Abstract
This study aims to test empirically the effect of two contextual variables, namely task uncertainty and decentralization on managerial performance with the Management Accounting System (SAM) as an intervening variable. Besides, this research also examines the effect of each contextual variable with SAM, the effect of SAM on managerial performance either directly or moderated by the two contextual variables.
Respondents in this study were functional managers of large-scale printing companies in Banten. The sample used was 100 managerial functional. The analysis tool uses Structural Equational Modeling (SEM) through Partial Least Square (PLS) and Sobel Test.
The results show that task uncertainty has a positive and significant effect on managerial performance, decentralization has a positive and significant impact on managerial performance, management accounting systems have a positive and significant impact on managerial performance, task uncertainty has a positive and significant impact on the management accounting system. , decentralization has a positive and significant effect on the management accounting system. The results of the indirect effect test proved that task uncertainty had an effect on managerial performance mediated by the management accounting system.
Key word : Task uncertainty, decentralization, management accounting systems, managerial performance
Downloads
References
Atiek Sri Purwati, & Zulaikha, S. (2006). Teori Kontinjensi, Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen Dan Outcomes Perusahaan: Implikasinya Dalam Riset Masa Kini Dan Masa Yang Akan Datang. \, 4(1), 1–11.
Ahmasafari, Chitranigrum 1995. ”Analisis Pengaruh Interaksi Antara Sistem Akuntansi Allison, P.D. 1977. “ Testing for Interraction in Multiple Regression”. American Journal of Sociology.pp. 144 – 153.
Atkitson. 1995. Management Accounting. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice
Hall
Chong, V.K. 1996. “Management Accounting Systems, Task Uncertainty and Managerial Performance: A Research Note”. Accounting, Organizations and Society. Vol. 21, No. 25. pp. 415 – 421.
Desmiyawati, "Desentralisasi, Ketidakpastian Lingkungan Dan Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial , 2010, Pekbis Jurnal, Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Riau.
Dwinarian, F., Asnawi, M., & Sanggenafa, M. (2017). Pengaruh Desentralisasi Dan Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial (Studi Kasus Di Perbankan Kota Jayapura dan Kabupaten Jayapura). Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Daerah, 12(1), 39–55.
Ernawan, V. Budi. 1995. “Analisa Pengaruh Interaksi Ketidakpastian Lingkungan, Desentralisasi, dan Informasi Akuntansi Manajemen terhadap Prestasi Kerja Manajer”. Skripsi Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta. Tidak dipublikasikan.
Gerloff, E.A. 1985. Organizational Theory and Design – A Strategic Approach for Management, New York: Mc. Graw-Hill.
Gordon, E.A. and Miller. 1986. “A Contigency Framework for the Design of Accounting Information Systems”. Accounting, Organizations and Society. pp. 59– 69.
Gordon, L.A. and V.K. Narayanan. 1984. “Management Accounting Systems, Perceived Environmental Uncertainty and Organization Structure: An Empirical Investigation”. Accounting, Organizations and Society. Vol.9, No.1. pp. 259 – 285.
Govindarajan, V. 1986. “Impact of Participation in the Budgetary Process on Management Attitudes and Performance : Universalistic and Contigency Perspectives”. Decision Sciences. pp. 496 –516.
Gul and Chia, Y.M. 1994. “The Effect of Management Accounting Systems, Perceived Environmental Uncertainty and Decentralization on Managerial Performance: A Tes of Three-way Interaction”. Accounting, Organizations and Society. Vol. 19. pp 413 – 426.
Heller, F.A and Yulk. 1989. “Participation in Managerial Decision Making and Situational Variable”. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. pp. 230.
Hellriegel, D. and J.W. Slocum. 1987. Management: Contingency Approach. Addison Wesley. Inc.Chenhall, R.H. dan D. Morries. 1986. “The Impact of Structure, Environment, and Interdependence on the Perceived Usufulness of Management Accounting Systems”. Accounting Review. pp. 16 – 35.
Indriantoro dan Supomo. B. 1998. “Pengaruh Struktur dan Kultur Organisasional Terhadap Keefektipan Anggaran Partisipasi dalam Peningkatan Kinerja Manajerial”. Kelola, No.18/VII/1998. pp. 61–80.
Jaryanto, 2008, "Pengaruh Desentralisasi terhadap kinerja Manajerial dengan sistem Akuntansi Manajamen ( Broadscope, Timeliness, Agregation dan Integration) Sebagai Variabel Intervening" Fokus Ekonomi, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Surakarta.
Mahoney, T.A., T.H. Jerdee, and S.J. Carrol. Development of Managerial Performance: A Research Approach. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
Mutmainah, Kurniawati, 2009, Pengaruh Ketidakpastian Tugas Dan Desentralisasi Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Dengan Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen Sebagai Variabel Intervening, Tesis, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang
Miah, N.Z. and Mia L. 1996. “Decentralization, Accounting Control and Performance of Government Organizations: A New Zealand Empirical Study”. Financial Accountibility and Management.August 1996. pp. 173 – 189.
Nunnanly, J.C.1978. Psychometric Theory. New York: Mc. Graw – Hill. Otley, D.T. 1980. “The Contingency Theory of Management Accounting: Acheivement and Prognosis”. Accounting, Organizations and Society. p. 422.
Riyanto, Bambang. 1997. “Strategic Uncertainty, Management Accounting Systems and Performance: Emperical Investigation of Contigency Theory at a Firm Level”. Unpublished Ph. D, Dissertation, Temple University Schoonhoven, C.B. “Problems with Contigency Theory: Testing Assumptions Hidden Within the Language of Contingency Theory”. Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 26, No. 3. pp. 349 –377.
Soobaroyen dan Poorundersing, 2008, The effectiveness of management accounting systems Evidence from functional managers in a developing country, Managerial Auditing Journal Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 187-219
Thompson, J.D. 1986. Organizations in Action. Mc.Graw-Hill. Waterhouse, J.H. and Tiessen. 1995. A Contingency Framework for Management Accounting Systems Research, Accounting, dalam Managerial Accounting – The Behavioural Foundation. J.L. Livingstone, Colombus, Ohio: Grid Inc. pp. 65 – 80.
Widiastuti, Kiki, 2011, Pengaruh Teknologi Informasi dan Saling Ketergantungan terhadap Kinerja Manajerial dengan Karakteristik Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen sebagai Variabel Intervening, Karya Ilmiah, Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.
Wiryana, Augustinepengaruh Karakteristik Informasi Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Dengan Variabel Moderasi Strategi Bisnis, Perceived Environmental Uncertainty (Peu), Ketidakpastian Tugas Dan Desentralisasi, E-Journal Magister Akuntasi Trisakti Volume. 1 Nomor. 2 September 2014 Hal. 155-180, Jakarta.
Copyright (c) 2021 HERMAN WIJAYA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Author(s) retain the copyright of articles published in this journal, with first publication rights granted to JAK (Jurnal Akuntansi) : Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi This Work by JAK (Jurnal Akuntansi) : Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
